Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Don Konipol

Don Konipol has started 187 posts and replied 4907 times.

Post: Looking for Day-to-Day Tax & Legal Questions

Don Konipol
Lender
Pro Member
#1 Wholesaling Contributor
Posted
  • Lender
  • The Woodlands, TX
  • Posts 5,670
  • Votes 8,793
Quote from @Asef Obaid:

Hello everyone,

I was wondering how you all handle day-to-day tax or legal questions that come up in your real estate and business activities. Hiring a full-time CPA, tax strategist, or attorney can be quite expensive, so I’m exploring cost-effective alternatives.

I've heard that some investors subscribe to services like LegalZoom or Rocket Lawyer, but I’m curious—are these actually useful for real estate legal and tax strategy questions? Or do you have other recommendations?

Thanks

Here is how I handle a legal or tax question - but I am pretty knowledgable about both areas in regards to real estate

1. If I know, or think I know the answer I will verify it with the results of a Google search

2. If I’m unsure of the answer or don’t know I will again use Google, researching at least 3 authorities providing answers.  If all three authorities agree and I have confidence in the authorities, I will go with that.

3. Should I get contradictory opinions from the thee Google search authorities above, or should I not have much personal knowledge or experience in the area of the subject, or should the correct answer be vitally important, I will contact someone with the proper education, experience, credential, to be able to render a qualified opinion.  For legal issues, we do have an attorney who as a matter of course handles closings, document preparation, and legal strategy for us.  Since I am qualified as per tax and accounting issues, it’s pretty rare that I’m stumped on that one. However, last year I did come across a tax issue unclear to me, so I did contact our accountant for clarification. (The answer was NOT what I would have assumed - so good thing I checked!).  If the question concerns retirement plans, this is one of the most specialized fields in finance - fortunately one of my best friends is an actuary!

Of course for the investor with a couple of SFR for their portfolio (and probably wanting to build on that) the decision as to when to rely on “free” information and when to engage the (costly) services of a professional is a lot more difficult. I think that the serious investor should do everything to educate themselves as to accounting /tax issues as well as real estate law.  Then when a question comes up Google search to find authorities that are deemed reliable.  Until experienced and knowledgable, utilize the services of professionals not only for advice and document preparation, but as a means of acquiring the knowledge necessary to make your own advice.  

Post: Where to find Investors

Don Konipol
Lender
Pro Member
#1 Wholesaling Contributor
Posted
  • Lender
  • The Woodlands, TX
  • Posts 5,670
  • Votes 8,793
Quote from @Amanda Dobbs:

Is there a place to find Private Investors as in one person? If so, where?

Any of these real estate apps? 

In the past we dealt with one guy, we paid a little higher interest but the ease was great. 

Looking at 50% LTV currently.

If your borrowing is TRULY at 50% LTV, a little creativity on your part should uncover potential lenders.  Here’s what I’d do.  Upgrade to BP Pro, and post your deal seeking 50% LTV on the classified forum. 

Post: Wholesaling a Family Member’s Home

Don Konipol
Lender
Pro Member
#1 Wholesaling Contributor
Posted
  • Lender
  • The Woodlands, TX
  • Posts 5,670
  • Votes 8,793
Quote from @Jerry Velez:

Hi Community,

I have been thinking of some creative financing ideas and this one has been intrigued. Would it be legal to wholesale a family members home (est. 1M), and receive a fee for the wholesale services? 

Theoretically, I should be able to collect the funds from the deal, should my family member decide to go through with the deal. And they will get their payment from the buyer.  

I can’t think of a better way to kill a relationship…..

Post: New Partnership Model

Don Konipol
Lender
Pro Member
#1 Wholesaling Contributor
Posted
  • Lender
  • The Woodlands, TX
  • Posts 5,670
  • Votes 8,793
Quote from @V.G Jason:
Quote from @Don Konipol:
Quote from @Shiloh Lundahl:

I'd love to get some feedback and hear your thoughts on the investing model that I am planning on ramping up this year.

Let me give you some background for context and to help you understand why I am moving in this direction with investing this year. 

I have been investing in real estate for the past 15 years but more actively for the past 10 years. People started to ask me to help them learn how to invest so I started coaching new investors over the past 7 years on how to start investing in real estate. I would charge them $5,000 with the ability for them to earn back $2,500 and I'd have a call with them every other week to guide them on how to find deals and money lenders and how to get the properties fixed up and get them refinanced, etc. About 90% of my coaching students bought properties and increased their net worth on average of $100,000 the year we worked together. A mentor of mine told me that I was charging too little for the amount of value I was providing. So I increased my rate to $10,000 with the ability of my coaching students to earn back $5,000 if they completed their homework in betweeen coaching sessions that was geared towards helping them meet their real estate goals. The results of my students were about the same and they would create about $100,000 of increased net worth during the coaching program. My mentor told me I was still charging too low for the value I was providing. 

Towards the end of last year, one of my buddies contacted me and told me his accountant told him that he needed to buy some real estate to lower his tax bill. I shared with him some ideas on how to buy undervalued real estate and he basically told me that he would rather just partner with me and provide the money and have me find and manage the investment and then split the profits.  So I found and purchased 3 undervalued properties from wholesalers and we are just finishing up the 3rd one. Each property is estimated to create about $70,000 of profit over the next 3 years.  He has deposited $100,000 into the business account. That covers the down payment for the purchase, the rehab, and the $18,000 for reserves for the account, and $5,000 for me for each property for the time and work involved. That $5,000 is part of my portion of the 50% of the profits and will be deducted from my payout when the property is sold. 

The property will be rented out on a 3-year lease option and will be either sold to the tenant buyer or sold on the market if the tenant decides not to exercise the option.  

The money partner on these deals will bring in about $35,000 to $50,000 for each deal and the expected IRR is around 25%-35% each year for the 3 year period essentially doubling their money in 3-4 years.

So rather than focusing on picking up a couple of coaching clients this year, I think I am just going to focus on finding money partners to buy deals with.  I already have the knowledge, experience, and systems in place to do about 20 properties this year. So I think I am going to  shift my focus away from coaching and more towards partnering.

I'd love to get hear some of your thoughts and get some of your feedback. 

Lots of interesting feedback - but even if I didn’t feel the OPs offer to passive investors was great - I wouldn’t think it EVIL - which seems to be the opinion of some responders……

Key point for people evaluating the “fairness” and “competitiveness’ of the offering is that the sponsor is receiving too much benefit for too little contribution.  The THING they seem to not be taking into account is that the sponsor is responsible for one half of any losses.  This brings a much greater liability into play, and in my opinion provides greater balance.

Is this offering the best “deal” for a passive investors?  Probably not even close.  Is it the worst deal?  Again, not even close.  Basically what we have is a pretty “average” real estate opportunity investment.  There are a lot more dangerous, and horribly structured investments being offered every day.

I can see this investment fitting into an investors portfolio of the investor meets and has contact one on one with the sponsor.  This brings us to the question of scalability. 

Again, in my opinion this model doesn’t scale, beyond a point that is reached sooner rather than later.  There are many reasons.  One big one is that scaling the lease option sale to a homeowner will attract both public regulatory scrutiny and private litigation, perhaps class action, once it reaches a certain threshold.  And the cost of legal defense , even if successful, will drive the company out of business.  

I never said evil, but you can exaggerate and say that. I can say without a doubt that you've had your hands in the cookie jar on some partnerships that would be deemed as predatory, too. And because of that, you're putting a disclaimer before analyzing Shiloh's deal just to make sure the crumbs don't appear.

For the most part, you agree Shiloh's deal isn't that great. And it could fit a unique investor. And I agree, an investor that does zero diligence, doesn't value capital, and wants to find a structure that's RE related but not REITs, the debt behind it, syndications, etc. This could be perfect for them.

I still fail how to see it defeats the options that I provided, or leans towards a better passive model or even a "partnership".

I think the best suggestion in this thread is actually from @Josh Young where @Shiloh Lundahl should seek debt partners. Now that's a way to go. Secure the debt by real estate, now we're talking a great partnership deal. That way someone can have "passive" exposure through the debt, yet still have RE exposure in some form or fashion. Giving up 50% equity on a value add in today's environment is just too much to give up without a significantly better return that's not offered through almost any other asset class. 




“ I can say without a doubt that you've had your hands in the cookie jar on some partnerships that would be deemed as predatory, too”

V.G. Jason, or WHOEVER you really are (your BP page gives absolutely NO information about you - typical for those “keyboard warriors” who spend their time trying to “get even” for the bullying they endured during childhood)

Your tactics are reprehensible, reminiscent of Wisconsin Senator JOE MCCARTHY.  You’ve made an accusation, used it to imply that I’m covering something up, and provided not even an example, evidence, foundation, etc. for your outrageous claim.  Put your “money where your mouth is”. Since you can “say without a doubt” then you must have , at your fingertips, evidence that I’ve “had my hands in the cookie jar on some partnerships that would be deemed predatory”.  And since your life, such as it is, consists of responding to every BP post mentioning yourself within 15 seconds, you should have no problem responding within the next, say, 1 hour with your “evidence” to back up your slanderous remark. 

I’ve come across more than a few like you in my 45 years as a real estate investor.  And those who are argumentative, bitter, accusatory, slanderous, and addicted to drama are ALWAYS putting on “bravado” to cover their singular lack of success in business, love and life.  

You are a BAD MAN, V.G. Jason, a very bad man.   (As counsel for the Army told Senator Joe McCarthy during the conclusion of the Senate Committee on UnAmerican Activities Hearings). 

Post: Transfer deed, retain mortgage, without due-on-sale

Don Konipol
Lender
Pro Member
#1 Wholesaling Contributor
Posted
  • Lender
  • The Woodlands, TX
  • Posts 5,670
  • Votes 8,793
Quote from @Brandon Bell:

I've owned a property for four years with a standard fixed-rate mortgage, and now I'm looking to convert it into a rental. My goal is to transfer both the deed and the mortgage to an LLC. My main concern is how to avoid activating the due-on-sale clause when transferring the deed. I'd like to keep the current fixed-rate mortgage in place and, if possible, have the debt transferred to the LLC as well. Any advice on how to navigate this?

I’d appreciate any feedback from those who can offer advice, but I’m also curious about what specific type of attorney or local resource I should reach out to for guidance.

I’ve seen references to the Garn-St. Germain Act and using a trust for subject-to approaches that may work for this kind of transfer, but I’m not sure it totally applies to my situation.

The previous replies stated answers to your questions, but some of the answers may not have been clear. 

1. The debt can not be TRANSFERRED to the LLC.  The LLC can sign an agreement with the debtor (mortgagor, that’s YOU) accepting liability for the debt, but that’s only between the two parties involved in the agreement.  You remain liable to the note holder.

2. The St Germain Act states that state governments can NOT outlaw due on sale clauses except for transfers from an individual to a revocable living trust. Since the trust is a disregarded entity, the benefit is bypassing  probate, not tax issues or liability concerns. 

So, transferring title to an LLC is a transfer as defined by most mortgage or deed of trust documents as a trigger of the so called due on sale clause. 

From a practical viewpoint, I wouldn’t think the lender would accelerate the note, if the LLC were a single member LLC, you were that member, and it was treated as a “disregarded” entity for tax purposes. 

Post: Please Stop Calling My Sick Grandmother!

Don Konipol
Lender
Pro Member
#1 Wholesaling Contributor
Posted
  • Lender
  • The Woodlands, TX
  • Posts 5,670
  • Votes 8,793
Quote from @Stuart Udis:

Good luck, wholesalers are the least likely to follow do not call list/related legislation. Most also work off of call lists that are incredibly outdated, so anything you do today likely won't have an impact for a while....I received a call from an idiot on Tuesday wanting to know if I would sell a piece of land. It's land where I built condos and obtained a C/O March 2022. Told them to do a drive by and call me back with an offer :)

The person who called you probably just spent $15,000 for mentoring and “education”, and is now in panic that his 250 cold calls have not produced anything . 

Post: New Partnership Model

Don Konipol
Lender
Pro Member
#1 Wholesaling Contributor
Posted
  • Lender
  • The Woodlands, TX
  • Posts 5,670
  • Votes 8,793
Quote from @Shiloh Lundahl:

I'd love to get some feedback and hear your thoughts on the investing model that I am planning on ramping up this year.

Let me give you some background for context and to help you understand why I am moving in this direction with investing this year. 

I have been investing in real estate for the past 15 years but more actively for the past 10 years. People started to ask me to help them learn how to invest so I started coaching new investors over the past 7 years on how to start investing in real estate. I would charge them $5,000 with the ability for them to earn back $2,500 and I'd have a call with them every other week to guide them on how to find deals and money lenders and how to get the properties fixed up and get them refinanced, etc. About 90% of my coaching students bought properties and increased their net worth on average of $100,000 the year we worked together. A mentor of mine told me that I was charging too little for the amount of value I was providing. So I increased my rate to $10,000 with the ability of my coaching students to earn back $5,000 if they completed their homework in betweeen coaching sessions that was geared towards helping them meet their real estate goals. The results of my students were about the same and they would create about $100,000 of increased net worth during the coaching program. My mentor told me I was still charging too low for the value I was providing. 

Towards the end of last year, one of my buddies contacted me and told me his accountant told him that he needed to buy some real estate to lower his tax bill. I shared with him some ideas on how to buy undervalued real estate and he basically told me that he would rather just partner with me and provide the money and have me find and manage the investment and then split the profits.  So I found and purchased 3 undervalued properties from wholesalers and we are just finishing up the 3rd one. Each property is estimated to create about $70,000 of profit over the next 3 years.  He has deposited $100,000 into the business account. That covers the down payment for the purchase, the rehab, and the $18,000 for reserves for the account, and $5,000 for me for each property for the time and work involved. That $5,000 is part of my portion of the 50% of the profits and will be deducted from my payout when the property is sold. 

The property will be rented out on a 3-year lease option and will be either sold to the tenant buyer or sold on the market if the tenant decides not to exercise the option.  

The money partner on these deals will bring in about $35,000 to $50,000 for each deal and the expected IRR is around 25%-35% each year for the 3 year period essentially doubling their money in 3-4 years.

So rather than focusing on picking up a couple of coaching clients this year, I think I am just going to focus on finding money partners to buy deals with.  I already have the knowledge, experience, and systems in place to do about 20 properties this year. So I think I am going to  shift my focus away from coaching and more towards partnering.

I'd love to get hear some of your thoughts and get some of your feedback. 

Lots of interesting feedback - but even if I didn’t feel the OPs offer to passive investors was great - I wouldn’t think it EVIL - which seems to be the opinion of some responders……

Key point for people evaluating the “fairness” and “competitiveness’ of the offering is that the sponsor is receiving too much benefit for too little contribution.  The THING they seem to not be taking into account is that the sponsor is responsible for one half of any losses.  This brings a much greater liability into play, and in my opinion provides greater balance.

Is this offering the best “deal” for a passive investors?  Probably not even close.  Is it the worst deal?  Again, not even close.  Basically what we have is a pretty “average” real estate opportunity investment.  There are a lot more dangerous, and horribly structured investments being offered every day.

I can see this investment fitting into an investors portfolio of the investor meets and has contact one on one with the sponsor.  This brings us to the question of scalability. 

Again, in my opinion this model doesn’t scale, beyond a point that is reached sooner rather than later.  There are many reasons.  One big one is that scaling the lease option sale to a homeowner will attract both public regulatory scrutiny and private litigation, perhaps class action, once it reaches a certain threshold.  And the cost of legal defense , even if successful, will drive the company out of business.  

Post: The Most DANGEROUS Real Estate Investments for the “Amateur” Investor

Don Konipol
Lender
Pro Member
#1 Wholesaling Contributor
Posted
  • Lender
  • The Woodlands, TX
  • Posts 5,670
  • Votes 8,793
Quote from @Patrick Roberts:
Quote from @Ken M.:
Quote from @Tracy Z. Rewey:
Quote from @Ken M.:
Quote from @Tracy Z. Rewey:
Quote from @Ken M.:
Quote from @Tracy Z. Rewey:
@Tracy Z. Rewey: What is the solution for a Due on Sale call when you buy using SubTo and sell using a Wrap?

Great question.  That (and insurance issues) are two big risks. All fancy footwork and tricky strategies aside (insert sarcasm)... the ultimate solution is to pay it off if it gets called due. 

It is one of the reasons I like a Wrap Note and Mortgage (or Deed of Trust).  If created correctly, it could be sold (in full or part) to a note investor that would payoff the underlying 1st from proceeds when they bought the wrap note. 

The other way to satisfy is to get the property owner to refinance but that is not always in your control.  With a properly written and qualified wrap note the seller of the property (that is the holder of the wrap note) still has an interest and an asset they can sell. A good attorney, RMLO, and servicing company play a big part of this.

.
@Tracy Z. ReweyYour Comment: "the ultimate solution is to pay it off if it gets called due."

Hint: Once you sell a property on a Wrap, it is no longer yours to sell or refinance.
So, are you saying "you pay off a property you no longer own" out of pocket?


How do you call a performing Wrap due, in order to cover the Due On Sale on a property you did a SubTo on if your buyer is within his rights on the Wrap?

Put another way,
1. You buy a property SubTo 
2. You sell the property to someone on a "Wrap"
3. The lender finds out the property has been sold, twice now, and exercises their rights under the Due On Sale and gives you 30 days to correct or they go to foreclosure.

What happens?
What do you do?

Hi Ken, You are right you no longer own the property when you sell on a wrap.  You now own the mortgagee's interest in the wrap mortgage and note (or the beneficial interest in the all inclusive deed of trust).  You are collecting payments on your wrap note and mortgage from the owner of the property and sending on some of the payment to the underlying lien holder (or better having your licensed servicer do this).

What you have to sell is the wrap mortgage to a note investor.  When note investors buy the rights to receive payments on the wrap mortgage, we will payoff the underlying lien out of proceeds. 

You are not selling the property.  You are selling the wrap mortgage to payoff the lien (that you owe if you were the seller on a wrap).

Probably 80% of the notes we buy we have a payoff to an underlying 1st lender where the seller on the seller financed note still owes money to a bank from when they bought the property. Once that payoff is made the wrap mortgage moves to first position. 

A wrap does NOT remove the risk of a due on sale clause being exercised by the 1st position lender.  It just gives a layer of protection to the property seller that they don't get with a straight sub to (without a wrap).

The other option is to encourage or help the property owner go and refinance.  As mentioned, that is not in your control.  But selling the wrap mortgage to a note buyer is in your control.  It is very important that the Wrap Mortgage is written at market terms using a knowledgeable attorney, an RMLO, and a servicing entity.

These have risk and I'm not saying a new investor should go out and do them.  My view is there is more protection on a wrap than a sub to and with the right disclosures and underwriting can be an alternative option.  I don't like a straight sub-to.  It is why it was first on my top 5 of current risks.

Feel free to DM me and I'll send you my 10 Tips for Wrap Mortgages along with a video from an attorney that knows this stuff. I've been at this since 1988 and have seen them go wonderfully well and horribly wrong. My mission is to have people use creative financing  safely, ethically, and legally.

@Tracy Z. Rewey: So, if someone takes over a $375,000 mortgage using SubTo on a property worth $400,000 and turns around and sells the property for $405,000 on a Wrap mortgage with a Note of $405,000 (full value) to someone else, he now has paper, not a house. 

Let's say things go wrong down the road, any profit from the Wrap has been spent of course, the DOS gets called. How much can he sell the Wrap mortgage for to an investor?

What is the discount on the Note and how much are closing costs?

Wouldn't the Note would have to sell for nearly 100% to cover the Due On Sale? How likely is that?

@Don Konipol Any thoughts?


@Chris Seveney: Is that a note you would buy?


@Ken M. Great question. That is the kind of wrap note that would be a miss in my book. If the property is worth $400,000, a note buyer will base their maximum ITV Investment To Value on that value. The first alone in your example is at a 94% LTV Loan To Value ($375,000 1st divided by $400,000 value) and the wrap mortgage is underwater at 101% LTV ($405,000 divided by $400,000 value). I'd be a pass. We want to see equity, seasoning, a quality borrower, and good terms. We also buy at a discount (pricing depending on those qualities). I don't know any note buyers that would fund enough to payoff the underlying 1st in that scenario.

That's exactly my point. Selling the Wrap Note is not a good solution to solving a Due On Sale. It sounds good in theory, but in practice is highly unlikely.

It works just fine if the operator knows what theyre doing and structures it correctly. In the example you outlined and in the case of what a lot of people are doing right now (super high LTV underlying, negative equity on wrap, 100% financing for the buyer, low note rate, etc), then no, this wont work, primarily because whomever created the wrap note is either an idiot or a fraud.

Right!  Exactly.  Any transaction done with little or no equity contribution is most probably (there may be a few exceptions) in danger of “blowing up” from over leverage and insufficient equity cushion.  (The exception would be the rare deal where the property changes hand for a price far below real market value).
The sub to or wrap adds a certain degree of ADDITIONAL risk of failure.  However, the benefits of this type of transaction can still be safely realized with proper structuring and a good amount of equity injection. 

Post: The Most DANGEROUS Real Estate Investments for the “Amateur” Investor

Don Konipol
Lender
Pro Member
#1 Wholesaling Contributor
Posted
  • Lender
  • The Woodlands, TX
  • Posts 5,670
  • Votes 8,793
Quote from @Ken M.:
Quote from @Tracy Z. Rewey:
Quote from @Ken M.:
Quote from @Tracy Z. Rewey:
@Tracy Z. Rewey: What is the solution for a Due on Sale call when you buy using SubTo and sell using a Wrap?

Great question.  That (and insurance issues) are two big risks. All fancy footwork and tricky strategies aside (insert sarcasm)... the ultimate solution is to pay it off if it gets called due. 

It is one of the reasons I like a Wrap Note and Mortgage (or Deed of Trust).  If created correctly, it could be sold (in full or part) to a note investor that would payoff the underlying 1st from proceeds when they bought the wrap note. 

The other way to satisfy is to get the property owner to refinance but that is not always in your control.  With a properly written and qualified wrap note the seller of the property (that is the holder of the wrap note) still has an interest and an asset they can sell. A good attorney, RMLO, and servicing company play a big part of this.

.
@Tracy Z. ReweyYour Comment: "the ultimate solution is to pay it off if it gets called due."

Hint: Once you sell a property on a Wrap, it is no longer yours to sell or refinance.
So, are you saying "you pay off a property you no longer own" out of pocket?


How do you call a performing Wrap due, in order to cover the Due On Sale on a property you did a SubTo on if your buyer is within his rights on the Wrap?

Put another way,
1. You buy a property SubTo 
2. You sell the property to someone on a "Wrap"
3. The lender finds out the property has been sold, twice now, and exercises their rights under the Due On Sale and gives you 30 days to correct or they go to foreclosure.

What happens?
What do you do?

Hi Ken, You are right you no longer own the property when you sell on a wrap.  You now own the mortgagee's interest in the wrap mortgage and note (or the beneficial interest in the all inclusive deed of trust).  You are collecting payments on your wrap note and mortgage from the owner of the property and sending on some of the payment to the underlying lien holder (or better having your licensed servicer do this).

What you have to sell is the wrap mortgage to a note investor.  When note investors buy the rights to receive payments on the wrap mortgage, we will payoff the underlying lien out of proceeds. 

You are not selling the property.  You are selling the wrap mortgage to payoff the lien (that you owe if you were the seller on a wrap).

Probably 80% of the notes we buy we have a payoff to an underlying 1st lender where the seller on the seller financed note still owes money to a bank from when they bought the property. Once that payoff is made the wrap mortgage moves to first position. 

A wrap does NOT remove the risk of a due on sale clause being exercised by the 1st position lender.  It just gives a layer of protection to the property seller that they don't get with a straight sub to (without a wrap).

The other option is to encourage or help the property owner go and refinance.  As mentioned, that is not in your control.  But selling the wrap mortgage to a note buyer is in your control.  It is very important that the Wrap Mortgage is written at market terms using a knowledgeable attorney, an RMLO, and a servicing entity.

These have risk and I'm not saying a new investor should go out and do them.  My view is there is more protection on a wrap than a sub to and with the right disclosures and underwriting can be an alternative option.  I don't like a straight sub-to.  It is why it was first on my top 5 of current risks.

Feel free to DM me and I'll send you my 10 Tips for Wrap Mortgages along with a video from an attorney that knows this stuff. I've been at this since 1988 and have seen them go wonderfully well and horribly wrong. My mission is to have people use creative financing  safely, ethically, and legally.

@Tracy Z. Rewey: So, if someone takes over a $375,000 mortgage using SubTo on a property worth $400,000 and turns around and sells the property for $405,000 on a Wrap mortgage with a Note of $405,000 (full value) to someone else, he now has paper, not a house. 

Let's say things go wrong down the road, any profit from the Wrap has been spent of course, the DOS gets called. How much can he sell the Wrap mortgage for to an investor?

What is the discount on the Note and how much are closing costs?

Wouldn't the Note would have to sell for nearly 100% to cover the Due On Sale? How likely is that?

@Don Konipol Any thoughts?


@Chris Seveney: Is that a note you would buy?



Good question Ken.  I have never done a transaction, as a buyer, seller, real estate broker or lender where there was no equity or negative equity as per the buyer in the deal.  I know others have done this, but it’s not my mo.  For example, 8 years ago I sold a rooming house for $240k and received $40k down and wrapped a $200k 9% notes around an underlying  $125,000 6 % note.  If the buyer/borrower defaulted, I would make the underlying note payments while I pursued foreclosure.  If the note was called I’d pay if off.  

My experience has been that purchase transactions where the buyer has no or little skin on the game have a default rate many times that of buyers who place a significant down payment into the deal.  People ask, if a borrower has 20 - 25% down, why would they need private financing?  It’s because having cash available doesn’t not necessarily mean the borrower has the credit CAPACITY to obtain a loan.  

Post: First time investor needing some confidence!

Don Konipol
Lender
Pro Member
#1 Wholesaling Contributor
Posted
  • Lender
  • The Woodlands, TX
  • Posts 5,670
  • Votes 8,793
Quote from @Travis Timmons:

@Nicholas L. You already know the answer to that. Bunch of realtors come on a spout off that their clients cash flow from day 1 all the time. It's always crickets when you ask for an example. And a pro forma vs. end of year actuals are very, very different.

@Benjamin Ying The only way to cash flow in the current market is to employ a higher effort strategy like STR, MTR, rent by the room, etc.

The "cash flow on paper" properties in stagnant markets or C-D class neighborhoods are probably not the type of places that you want to own long term. My advice would be to find a great asset and match that with a strategy that is a bit more work to break even or eek out a little cash flow. Leverage + appreciation is what makes real estate outperform other asset classes. If you don't see real appreciation upside (both price and rent), it's just not worth the hassle. We overthink real estate...Just find a place that people with options want to live. 


“And a pro forma vs. end of year actuals are very, very different.”


45 years investing in real estate.  I have NEVER seen a pro forma statement put together by a seller or broker that 

1. Had any basis in reality

2. Was in any way reflective of past experience

3. That had even a passing resemblance to tax returns or financial statements

4. That could be achieved without spending an inordinate additional amount in cap ex; 

In fact all I have seen had these items in common

1. Were based on dubious and unproven speculation, assumptions and best case scenarios

2. Were obviously “reverse engineered” to find a way to “back into” an attractive or at least acceptable cap rate

3. Often contained mathematical mistakes

4. Tended to leave off some categories of expenses completely

5. Assumed nothing could possibly go wrong in the next 5 years 


what you want when you look at an investment property is to know the current rental amounts, specific expense items, and conditions of the building, grounds, and mechanical systems.  The rest of the numbers the investor needs to “fill in” themselves based on a thorough due diligence.  If you’re not willing to do this, then you may be best off investing in some kind of real estate fund concept.  Prices in relation to rent are too high to have the cushion that was available before.