Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Short-Term & Vacation Rental Discussions
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 2 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

236
Posts
152
Votes
Michael Rutkowski
  • Specialist
  • Bozeman, MT
152
Votes |
236
Posts

What is your STR vacancy, and is your market saturated yet?

Michael Rutkowski
  • Specialist
  • Bozeman, MT
Posted

You might have heard this one before... A small town in a beautiful location, with an under priced real estate market, gets swamped by investors who bought up all the property to rent to tourists. Sound familiar? It is happening more and more around the World, not just in the US. I recently got interviewed by Business Insider on the topic, and you can read my thoughts about this here:

https://www.businessinsider.co...

But essentially, the market is no longer healthy, and those properties which don't stand out aren't getting the bookings, in an over-saturated STR environment. Bozeman's STR proportions are about 3-5% of total housing units. We have a diverse economy here compared to the rest of Montana towns, but yet tourism always is a foundation of our economy. And real estate plays into that. So in my opinion, 5% of total housing units being STR is too much. The City has run into a $1.4M education deficit, and I can tell you they won't be banning STR's anytime soon, but enforcement has gone up on them. The Bozeman Tenant Union, which is fighting for to ban STR's would have an easier time banning these around Disneyland, than here, as we have strong property rights, lowish taxes, and the City is aware of who pays the bills to keep our town shiny and new.

As the prime rate gets higher, and more buyers are pushed out of the market, it becomes very appealing to buyers to have some option to cashflow. Something like an ADU can make a first time home purchase possible now for a family, if they rent out that unit for example. But more and more, if a property doesn't have amenities, guests will either book a hotel for a cheaper price, or go find a better STR.

So let me ask you a few questions: How long have you owned a STR? What is your vacancy now, vs before the STR boom (pre-ABB IPO)? What proportion of your town is STR/total housing units? I'd love to hear about insights into your areas.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

12,314
Posts
14,903
Votes
John Underwood
Pro Member
#1 Short-Term & Vacation Rental Discussions Contributor
  • Investor
  • Greer, SC
14,903
Votes |
12,314
Posts
John Underwood
Pro Member
#1 Short-Term & Vacation Rental Discussions Contributor
  • Investor
  • Greer, SC
Replied
Quote from @Michael Rutkowski:

You might have heard this one before... A small town in a beautiful location, with an under priced real estate market, gets swamped by investors who bought up all the property to rent to tourists. Sound familiar? It is happening more and more around the World, not just in the US. I recently got interviewed by Business Insider on the topic, and you can read my thoughts about this here:

https://www.businessinsider.co...

But essentially, the market is no longer healthy, and those properties which don't stand out aren't getting the bookings, in an over-saturated STR environment. Bozeman's STR proportions are about 3-5% of total housing units. We have a diverse economy here compared to the rest of Montana towns, but yet tourism always is a foundation of our economy. And real estate plays into that. So in my opinion, 5% of total housing units being STR is too much. The City has run into a $1.4M education deficit, and I can tell you they won't be banning STR's anytime soon, but enforcement has gone up on them. The Bozeman Tenant Union, which is fighting for to ban STR's would have an easier time banning these around Disneyland, than here, as we have strong property rights, lowish taxes, and the City is aware of who pays the bills to keep our town shiny and new.

As the prime rate gets higher, and more buyers are pushed out of the market, it becomes very appealing to buyers to have some option to cashflow. Something like an ADU can make a first time home purchase possible now for a family, if they rent out that unit for example. But more and more, if a property doesn't have amenities, guests will either book a hotel for a cheaper price, or go find a better STR.

So let me ask you a few questions: How long have you owned a STR? What is your vacancy now, vs before the STR boom (pre-ABB IPO)? What proportion of your town is STR/total housing units? I'd love to hear about insights into your areas.


 You can't apply this to every property in every area. Sure some areas are this way.

I still have solid occupancy and am steadily increasing prices because I have great properties. 

  • John Underwood
  • Loading replies...