Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 2 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

49
Posts
13
Votes
Jónas Tryggvi Stefánsson
  • Reykjavík, Iceland
13
Votes |
49
Posts

Combining pre screening and the application?

Jónas Tryggvi Stefánsson
  • Reykjavík, Iceland
Posted

I'm learning how to screen tenants and how the applicant process should take place. I've read the Turners' book on managing properties and I've taken a look at BP's guide to tenant screening.

The guide suggest that a pre screening takes place. From there the most standout applicants are allowed to check out the property for a viewing. Finally, after showing the property and getting to know the potential client through a series of questions the prospect is finally allowed to submit a formal application where a series of important questions are submitted that make or break the applicant after the information has been used to verify minimal standards and background checks.

To me this seems to be highly inefficient. Is there a specific reason why one should not have the prospect submit the application right away, including all the questions and then determine the best applicants to show the property? How is your process? 

It doesn't seem very efficient to pre screen a lot of tenants and take them to a viewing when one could have known on beforehand they the potential tenant would never qualify, just by asking the make or break questions right away.

A pro I can see to asking all questions upfront is that lazy people or people who realise they would never qualify don't bother applying. I might get away from wasting my time and prospects time when viewing who never had a chance in the first place

A con I can see however is that I'd waste 5 minutes from a lot of people. Some people might feel uncomfortable giving too much information away without having met the landlord or manager.

I'd like to optimise the process as possible for the manager and the potential tenants. Can you please help me understand why its not proposed like this? Thanks! 

P.s. One reason I've seen is that a manager would be wasting his time processing an application of someone who doesn't stand a chance to pass the pre screen but I'd argue that one could just stop processing the application at any time. Right? 

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

6,603
Posts
6,948
Votes
Bjorn Ahlblad
Pro Member
#5 Multi-Family and Apartment Investing Contributor
  • Investor
  • Shelton, WA
6,948
Votes |
6,603
Posts
Bjorn Ahlblad
Pro Member
#5 Multi-Family and Apartment Investing Contributor
  • Investor
  • Shelton, WA
Replied

@Jonas Tryggvi Stefansson we do a pretty thorough pre-screen over the phone and if they seem qualified we send an app via txt or email-the vast majority of callers do not get this far. When, or if, we get it back and everything checks out, only then do we show the unit. If everyone is happy we do the tenant paid credit and BG check. That is our process and we have been doing it this way for years.

Loading replies...