Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

Account Closed
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Las Vegas, NV
1,347
Votes |
2,334
Posts

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

215
Posts
378
Votes
Jeff Willis
  • CA & NV
378
Votes |
215
Posts
Jeff Willis
  • CA & NV
Replied

California has SB 50 which does exactly the same thing.  Calif, like Minneapolis, cloaks the real purpose under terms like "affordable housing, inclusive neighborhoods, transit-friendly, etc." but it is for the sole purpose of increasing political power and tax revenue.

Housing costs X dollars per S/F and that will not change, and it is not affordable by the standards needed to create self-sustaining low-income housing. Until the states and local Governments provider tax property breaks, there will not be low income housing, but that would go against their plan.

Loading replies...