Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 5 years ago,

User Stats

3
Posts
0
Votes
David Brown
0
Votes |
3
Posts

Turnkey provider tenant vacancy

David Brown
Posted

So, if I can sum up my question, I guess it would be this. In a scenario If I don’t have renter’s insurance and a tenant moves out of a property that I have purchased from a turnkey provider company; would I now have to wait until another renter to moves in order for my cash flow to start again? Secondly is it the sole responsibility of the turnkey provider to put another renter in? I’m asking of course, because If I finance this property, I am still required to pay the mortgage which would now come directly and completely from my pocket until which time another tenant is in place. Is this a possibility? What if any, is my protection in a situation like this?

Loading replies...