Everything You Need to Know About AB 2216: Pet Ownership in Rental Housing

[Steve Welty]

Hey BiggerPockets community,

Steve Welty here, excited to share some insights on a new piece of legislation that could have a big impact on landlords and tenants alike in California: Assembly Bill 2216 (AB 2216). If you’re a pet owner, landlord, or just someone interested in rental housing, here’s what you need to know.

What’s the Purpose of AB 2216?

The goal of AB 2216 is to prevent landlords from having blanket bans on common household pets in rental properties. This bill is all about making it easier for pet owners to find housing and ensuring there are more pet-friendly rental options out there.

Essentially, landlords wouldn’t be able to say “no pets allowed” without a good reason. Plus, they wouldn’t be able to charge extra rent or additional security deposits specifically for pets.

Just a heads-up – these new rules wouldn’t apply to rental agreements signed before January 1, 2025.

Where Are We in the Legislative Process?

Assembly member Matt Haney introduced this bill on February 7, 2024. As of June 5, 2024, AB 2216 has passed the Assembly and is now with the Senate Judiciary Committee. The Assembly passed it with 46 votes in favor and 9 against on May 23, 2024.

What Does This Mean for Tenants?

This bill could be a game-changer for tenants with pets. More housing options, fewer pet surrenders, and a more stable living situation are some of the benefits. It recognizes how important pets are to many of us. Landlords can still have restrictions, but they need to be justified – like health or safety concerns – and properly documented.

What Are the Primary Concerns for Landlords?

Property Damage and Maintenance Issues:

Pets can cause significant property damage, including chewing, scratching, and soiling carpets and floors. Landlords worry that the security deposits allowed under the bill will not be sufficient to cover these damages.

The presence of pets can lead to higher maintenance costs due to wear and tear, noise complaints, and the need for more frequent and thorough cleaning.

Financial Implications:

 The bill prohibits landlords from charging additional rent or security deposits specifically for pets, which landlords argue is necessary to offset the increased risk and maintenance costs associated with allowing pets.

Landlords may need to increase their liability insurance coverage to protect against potential issues arising from having pets on the property, which could lead to higher insurance premiums.

Key Provisions of AB 2216

• No Blanket Pet Bans: Landlords can’t have blanket bans on common household pets without valid reasons.
• No Extra Charges: Landlords can’t charge extra rent or security deposits for pets.
• Documentation Requirement: Landlords must provide written documentation if they restrict pets for health or safety reasons.
• Pet Liability Insurance: The bill might require tenants with pets to have pet liability insurance.

As always, I’m here to discuss how this might impact us as property managers and landlords. Feel free to reach out with any questions or thoughts!

Best,
-Steve