Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 4 years ago,

User Stats

3
Posts
0
Votes
Sean ONeill
  • Abita Springs, LA
0
Votes |
3
Posts

Louisiana Tax Lien - Legal obligation to maintain property

Sean ONeill
  • Abita Springs, LA
Posted

I invested in tax liens in a Louisiana parish two years ago, and today I received a certified letter from an attorney representing the city.   The letter indicated that the property is "unsafe and dangerous under the provision of the City's building code and the Code of Ordinances.   Due to the circumstances that surrounds the structure, the city is seeking to demolish the property.   The letter states the importance to seek legal representation immediately.  

My stance/understanding is that I do not have a legal obligation to maintain the property, nor do I am required to fund the demolishing of the structure.   I do not have an ownership interest in the property.... Am I missing something?   Is this merely a tactic to scare me into financing something that I am not legally obligated?

Should I seek council regarding this matter or send correspondence with the City/Attorney surrounding my limited interest in this property.

Thanks for your assistance with this matter.

Loading replies...