Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 6 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

24
Posts
6
Votes
Joan Pla
  • Los Angeles, CA
6
Votes |
24
Posts

Buy SF in LA or MF outside of California?

Joan Pla
  • Los Angeles, CA
Posted

My wife and I's goal is to buy our first property towards the end of this year when we think we will have enough for a down payment.  But our dilemma is whether to buy in LA or outside of California. 

The same amount of money is enough for a 5% down in Los Angeles or 20% on more affordable markets. In LA we'd be buying a non-renovated SF (with granny's flat) where we'd move to and rent the granny's flat to help pay the mortgage.  Adding up what we pay now for rent + income from the guest house, we'd still have to add another $1000-$1500 to pay all expenses. Now, in the case of buying a triplex or fourplex in a cheaper market, we are thinking a turnkey property and saw some options that would give us about $450-$600/month positive cashflow.

On paper, it seems the smart option is to buy outside of state and get that cash flow going but there's one important thing, we live in a 1 bedroom apt with a 21-month old girl, which means maybe we have 1 more year at our current place and we'll definitely have to move to a 2-bd place and rent will increase by $500-$1000. at least, so then, there's not so much difference anymore.

I'd love to know your thoughts.

Thank you in advance!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

942
Posts
1,708
Votes
Arlen Chou
  • Investor
  • Los Altos, CA
1,708
Votes |
942
Posts
Arlen Chou
  • Investor
  • Los Altos, CA
Replied

@Joan Pla there are so many more advantages to doing a house hack than investing in a small multi out of state that it really does not make sense to burn time on looking out of state.  First off you get prop 13 that will protect your future property tax increases. Secondly, you get the debt pay down of having a tenant. Third you get better interest rates on a primary residence compared to an investment property. Fourth, there are other tax advantages, but I am not a tax professional so I suggest you speak to someone more qualified. Fifth, you get hands on experience in a very controlled situation.  Sixth, you don't have any PM fees that will eat at any income (if you choose to self manage).

Good luck!

Loading replies...