General Real Estate Investing
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated about 6 years ago,
Buy SF in LA or MF outside of California?
My wife and I's goal is to buy our first property towards the end of this year when we think we will have enough for a down payment. But our dilemma is whether to buy in LA or outside of California.
The same amount of money is enough for a 5% down in Los Angeles or 20% on more affordable markets. In LA we'd be buying a non-renovated SF (with granny's flat) where we'd move to and rent the granny's flat to help pay the mortgage. Adding up what we pay now for rent + income from the guest house, we'd still have to add another $1000-$1500 to pay all expenses. Now, in the case of buying a triplex or fourplex in a cheaper market, we are thinking a turnkey property and saw some options that would give us about $450-$600/month positive cashflow.
On paper, it seems the smart option is to buy outside of state and get that cash flow going but there's one important thing, we live in a 1 bedroom apt with a 21-month old girl, which means maybe we have 1 more year at our current place and we'll definitely have to move to a 2-bd place and rent will increase by $500-$1000. at least, so then, there's not so much difference anymore.
I'd love to know your thoughts.
Thank you in advance!