My wife and I's goal is to buy our first property towards the end of this year when we think we will have enough for a down payment. But our dilemma is whether to buy in LA or outside of California.
The same amount of money is enough for a 5% down in Los Angeles or 20% on more affordable markets. In LA we'd be buying a non-renovated SF (with granny's flat) where we'd move to and rent the granny's flat to help pay the mortgage. Adding up what we pay now for rent + income from the guest house, we'd still have to add another $1000-$1500 to pay all expenses. Now, in the case of buying a triplex or fourplex in a cheaper market, we are thinking a turnkey property and saw some options that would give us about $450-$600/month positive cashflow.
On paper, it seems the smart option is to buy outside of state and get that cash flow going but there's one important thing, we live in a 1 bedroom apt with a 21-month old girl, which means maybe we have 1 more year at our current place and we'll definitely have to move to a 2-bd place and rent will increase by $500-$1000. at least, so then, there's not so much difference anymore.
I'd love to know your thoughts.
Thank you in advance!