Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

1,320
Posts
1,059
Votes
Diane G.
  • CA
1,059
Votes |
1,320
Posts

how do I convence my stingy landlord friend

Diane G.
  • CA
Posted

My friend just rented his place out to a new tenant, with a move in date of this coming Thursday. New tenant is going to pay for all utility...

His previous tenant moved out about 2 weeks ago and city shut down water after the move out. My friend does not want to turn the water back on now because city will charge a fee for that... He wanted to wait until the new tenant moves in and have her call the city to put the water back on...

I feel this is so wrong, but I don't know how to explain this to my friend...Does anyone know of a law that says this is wrong?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

143
Posts
157
Votes
Replied

I don't see the problem. If the tenants are paying the water bill they'll have to put it in their names anyway.

Loading replies...