I just had 12x "discrimination" lawsuits/complaints filed against me...

I just had 12x "discrimination" lawsuits/complaints filed against me...

Member since 2022 · 53 posts · 27 votes

So quick backstory about me.. I have 2 rental properties on Long Island, NY and they're both located in the same town.

Property #1

-Legal 2-family duplex (2 units)

-Does not need to be owner-occupied since it’s a legal 2-family

-Has active rental permit with the town

Property #2

-Single family house w/accessory apartment (2 units + illegal basement apartment)

-I live in the upstairs unit

-Needs to be owner-occupied in order to get rental permit for the 2nd unit since it’s not a legal 2-family

-No scenario where the basement apartment will ever be legal

My family has been renting this house without a rental permit for several decades without any issue. We also have a pretty good relationship with all the neighbors which I'm sure helps.

The reason for me not getting a permit once obtaining this property is very simple -- I was given this house from my father, and the town that I'm located in, you're not able to get a rental permit unless the house is owner-occupied. I'm getting married in the next year and starting a family, and we plan to move out when that happens, which means that even if I went through the permitting process now and was granted a rental permit w/the town, I knew that ultimately I was going to find myself screwed when the time came to get a renewal on it (every 2 years), and I wasn't able to prove that the property was still owner-occupied. Also, I knew that they would 100% discover the illegal basement apartment and I would be screwed. This 1br1ba basement unit generates $1,800/month so I'm trying to keep it under the radar for as long as possible, especially since I have such a great tenant in there.

I recently had vacancy in 1 of the units in my house which is a 3br1ba. I had the listing on Avail (which I use as a rental manager, and posts to many other popular rental sites), Zillow, and Facebook Marketplace.

I already have a Section 8 tenant at Property #1 (which I acquired during the purchase), so I'm not opposed to the program at all, and to be honest, they pay above market rent in my area, so that worked for me. I also know I live in a state that is not very landlord-friendly, so the guaranteed rental income is very alluring to me. I've had such a good experience with the Section 8 tenant at Property #1, that I said multiple times via e-mail months ago to Section 8 that I wanted to go "all-in" on Section 8 properties and build a whole portfolio around it.

Now the issue is that Section 8 is super particular about making sure you have all your paperwork and permits in place before being allowed to onboard Section 8 tenants at your property. Since I didn't have a way to get a rental permit for Property #2, I knew I wasn't going to be able to accept Section 8 tenants, even if I wanted to.

Aside from all this, I was always told that I was not legally required to accept Section 8, so I was completely under the impression that I could tell applicants that I wasn't going to accept it.

Out of all of my applicants, I'd say about 15-20% of them asked if I accepted Section 8 vouchers. In all of these scenarios, I kindly replied "Sorry, no vouchers", or "I'm sorry, we're not accepting vouchers at this time". Pretty much everyone was pleasant and said no worries or asked if I knew someone who had a unit who did.

Some time goes by, I end up renting to a single guy, and all is well in the world. That is, until a few weeks later, I receive 12 notices from New York State Division of Human Rights that a local non-profit have filed 12 complaints against me on behalf of 2 individuals for "discrimination" of source of income. These 2 individuals appear to be a mother/son. They filed 4 complaints jointly, and 4 each individually (12 total). This non-profit specializes in fair housing practices/housing discrimination on Long Island, "Our mission is the elimination of unlawful housing discrimination and promotion of decent and affordable housing through advocacy and education." These complaints read as lawsuits would with the rectangle box on each one with "Complainant vs. Respondents".

Each complaint is accompanied by a form that I'm supposed to fill out to give my argument against why or why not I discriminated. In addition, the complaints are reading that the non-profit used actual actors/"testers" to reach out to me on these listings to confirm what these 2 individuals were saying was true, which of course, I also replied, "Sorry, no vouchers".

Now I've had to hire a lawyer who specializes in cases like this, and has actually gone up against this non-profit in the past, but with a much bigger client who owned 20+ apartment buildings, and was also openly saying "no Section 8 vouchers". They ended up settling that case for something like $380k. I had to pay this lawyer a $7,500 retainer for them to even talk to me.

Obviously this is BS, especially considering out of the 4 units that I have rented, 3 out of 4 of them are occupied by African American tenants, and 1 out of 4 of them are rented to Section 8. Also, I have e-mails going back months with Section 8 stating that I want to go "all-in" and build an entire portfolio around the program. In this scenario, I physically couldn't accept Section 8 because the house didn't have a legal rental permit. My lawyer is hoping to argue that against them but it seems like the most likely route is settlement, which means I'm paying thousands of dollars for nothing. Also, they state that if I'm found to have violated these peoples Human Rights, that I can lose my other Low Income Housing Tax Credits (aka Section 8 at my other property).

The complaints also state that these individuals suffered "anguish" for

Even if we decided to fight this, which we probably would have a decent chance at winning, it will cost me thousands in lawyer hourly billings vs. just paying out a settlement to these people.

At this point, my lawyer has filed an extension with NY Division of Human Rights and should be reaching out to the non-profit behind all of this mess some point soon.

It sucks because it will be more expensive to fight it and win, than to just take the L and pay them out a settlement. It looks like this lady works for a local homeless shelter, which makes sense how she knew to file the complaint with this specific non-profit the day after it happened. I'm starting to think she does this professionally and is a real estate "ambulance chaser". The complaint also states that they've experienced "anguish" over this ordeal.

At this point, only time will tell what they want to get out of this whole thing. It's pretty obvious that they want money, but I guess how much, only time will tell. I just wanted to share this story with you guys so you know what you're up against in the current world we live in.

I'll circle back and update everyone when I have more information or updates.

Wish me luck. smh.

8Reply
249 views

Most Popular Reply

Real Estate Broker · Cleveland Dayton Cincinnati Toledo Columbus & Akron, OH · Member since 2013 · 31k+ posts · 20k+ votes
2y
Quote from @Russell Brazil:
Being a landlord in New York is a special kind of hell I wish on no man. Govt is out of control.
I'd hardly call this an example of out of control government. There's a list of protected classes. He's responding to multiple inquiries stating he won't take a person from that protected class.  This is not a hard law to follow. The op should have known the law.

 The fact that being too irresponsible to pay for the roof over your own head is considered a protected class, is in itself, an example of the govt being out of control.

See this reply in the discussion

36 Replies

Jump to latestLatest
  • Real Estate Broker · Cleveland Dayton Cincinnati Toledo Columbus & Akron, OH · Member since 2013 · 31k+ posts · 20k+ votes
    2y
    Quote from @John S.:

    So quick backstory about me.. I have 2 rental properties on Long Island, NY and they're both located in the same town.

    Property #1

    -Legal 2-family duplex (2 units)

    -Does not need to be owner-occupied since it’s a legal 2-family

    -Has active rental permit with the town

    Property #2

    -Single family house w/accessory apartment (2 units + illegal basement apartment)

    -I live in the upstairs unit

    -Needs to be owner-occupied in order to get rental permit for the 2nd unit since it’s not a legal 2-family

    -No scenario where the basement apartment will ever be legal

    My family has been renting this house without a rental permit for several decades without any issue. We also have a pretty good relationship with all the neighbors which I'm sure helps.

    The reason for me not getting a permit once obtaining this property is very simple -- I was given this house from my father, and the town that I'm located in, you're not able to get a rental permit unless the house is owner-occupied. I'm getting married in the next year and starting a family, and we plan to move out when that happens, which means that even if I went through the permitting process now and was granted a rental permit w/the town, I knew that ultimately I was going to find myself screwed when the time came to get a renewal on it (every 2 years), and I wasn't able to prove that the property was still owner-occupied. Also, I knew that they would 100% discover the illegal basement apartment and I would be screwed. This 1br1ba basement unit generates $1,800/month so I'm trying to keep it under the radar for as long as possible, especially since I have such a great tenant in there.

    I recently had vacancy in 1 of the units in my house which is a 3br1ba. I had the listing on Avail (which I use as a rental manager, and posts to many other popular rental sites), Zillow, and Facebook Marketplace.

    I already have a Section 8 tenant at Property #1 (which I acquired during the purchase), so I'm not opposed to the program at all, and to be honest, they pay above market rent in my area, so that worked for me. I also know I live in a state that is not very landlord-friendly, so the guaranteed rental income is very alluring to me. I've had such a good experience with the Section 8 tenant at Property #1, that I said multiple times via e-mail months ago to Section 8 that I wanted to go "all-in" on Section 8 properties and build a whole portfolio around it.

    Now the issue is that Section 8 is super particular about making sure you have all your paperwork and permits in place before being allowed to onboard Section 8 tenants at your property. Since I didn't have a way to get a rental permit for Property #2, I knew I wasn't going to be able to accept Section 8 tenants, even if I wanted to.

    Aside from all this, I was always told that I was not legally required to accept Section 8, so I was completely under the impression that I could tell applicants that I wasn't going to accept it.

    Out of all of my applicants, I'd say about 15-20% of them asked if I accepted Section 8 vouchers. In all of these scenarios, I kindly replied "Sorry, no vouchers", or "I'm sorry, we're not accepting vouchers at this time". Pretty much everyone was pleasant and said no worries or asked if I knew someone who had a unit who did.

    Some time goes by, I end up renting to a single guy, and all is well in the world. That is, until a few weeks later, I receive 12 notices from New York State Division of Human Rights that a local non-profit have filed 12 complaints against me on behalf of 2 individuals for "discrimination" of source of income. These 2 individuals appear to be a mother/son. They filed 4 complaints jointly, and 4 each individually (12 total). This non-profit specializes in fair housing practices/housing discrimination on Long Island, "Our mission is the elimination of unlawful housing discrimination and promotion of decent and affordable housing through advocacy and education." These complaints read as lawsuits would with the rectangle box on each one with "Complainant vs. Respondents".

    Each complaint is accompanied by a form that I'm supposed to fill out to give my argument against why or why not I discriminated. In addition, the complaints are reading that the non-profit used actual actors/"testers" to reach out to me on these listings to confirm what these 2 individuals were saying was true, which of course, I also replied, "Sorry, no vouchers".

    Now I've had to hire a lawyer who specializes in cases like this, and has actually gone up against this non-profit in the past, but with a much bigger client who owned 20+ apartment buildings, and was also openly saying "no Section 8 vouchers". They ended up settling that case for something like $380k. I had to pay this lawyer a $7,500 retainer for them to even talk to me.

    Obviously this is BS, especially considering out of the 4 units that I have rented, 3 out of 4 of them are occupied by African American tenants, and 1 out of 4 of them are rented to Section 8. Also, I have e-mails going back months with Section 8 stating that I want to go "all-in" and build an entire portfolio around the program. In this scenario, I physically couldn't accept Section 8 because the house didn't have a legal rental permit. My lawyer is hoping to argue that against them but it seems like the most likely route is settlement, which means I'm paying thousands of dollars for nothing. Also, they state that if I'm found to have violated these peoples Human Rights, that I can lose my other Low Income Housing Tax Credits (aka Section 8 at my other property).

    The complaints also state that these individuals suffered "anguish" for

    Even if we decided to fight this, which we probably would have a decent chance at winning, it will cost me thousands in lawyer hourly billings vs. just paying out a settlement to these people.

    At this point, my lawyer has filed an extension with NY Division of Human Rights and should be reaching out to the non-profit behind all of this mess some point soon.

    It sucks because it will be more expensive to fight it and win, than to just take the L and pay them out a settlement. It looks like this lady works for a local homeless shelter, which makes sense how she knew to file the complaint with this specific non-profit the day after it happened. I'm starting to think she does this professionally and is a real estate "ambulance chaser". The complaint also states that they've experienced "anguish" over this ordeal.

    At this point, only time will tell what they want to get out of this whole thing. It's pretty obvious that they want money, but I guess how much, only time will tell. I just wanted to share this story with you guys so you know what you're up against in the current world we live in.

    I'll circle back and update everyone when I have more information or updates.

    Wish me luck. smh.

    Being a landlord in New York is a special kind of hell I wish on no man. Govt is out of control.
  • Investor · Greenville, SC · Member since 2016 · 5k+ posts · 13k+ votes
    2y

    Unfortunately, this was likely an inevitable outcome and cost over a multiple decade period of risk exposure...along with not getting appraisal value for the illegal unit when you sell.

  • Chris SeveneyBusiness Member
    Moderator
    Investor · VA · Member since 2015 · 21k+ posts · 19k+ votes
    2y
    Quote from @John S.:

    So quick backstory about me.. I have 2 rental properties on Long Island, NY and they're both located in the same town.

    Property #1

    -Legal 2-family duplex (2 units)

    -Does not need to be owner-occupied since it’s a legal 2-family

    -Has active rental permit with the town

    Property #2

    -Single family house w/accessory apartment (2 units + illegal basement apartment)

    -I live in the upstairs unit

    -Needs to be owner-occupied in order to get rental permit for the 2nd unit since it’s not a legal 2-family

    -No scenario where the basement apartment will ever be legal

    My family has been renting this house without a rental permit for several decades without any issue. We also have a pretty good relationship with all the neighbors which I'm sure helps.

    The reason for me not getting a permit once obtaining this property is very simple -- I was given this house from my father, and the town that I'm located in, you're not able to get a rental permit unless the house is owner-occupied. I'm getting married in the next year and starting a family, and we plan to move out when that happens, which means that even if I went through the permitting process now and was granted a rental permit w/the town, I knew that ultimately I was going to find myself screwed when the time came to get a renewal on it (every 2 years), and I wasn't able to prove that the property was still owner-occupied. Also, I knew that they would 100% discover the illegal basement apartment and I would be screwed. This 1br1ba basement unit generates $1,800/month so I'm trying to keep it under the radar for as long as possible, especially since I have such a great tenant in there.

    I recently had vacancy in 1 of the units in my house which is a 3br1ba. I had the listing on Avail (which I use as a rental manager, and posts to many other popular rental sites), Zillow, and Facebook Marketplace.

    I already have a Section 8 tenant at Property #1 (which I acquired during the purchase), so I'm not opposed to the program at all, and to be honest, they pay above market rent in my area, so that worked for me. I also know I live in a state that is not very landlord-friendly, so the guaranteed rental income is very alluring to me. I've had such a good experience with the Section 8 tenant at Property #1, that I said multiple times via e-mail months ago to Section 8 that I wanted to go "all-in" on Section 8 properties and build a whole portfolio around it.

    Now the issue is that Section 8 is super particular about making sure you have all your paperwork and permits in place before being allowed to onboard Section 8 tenants at your property. Since I didn't have a way to get a rental permit for Property #2, I knew I wasn't going to be able to accept Section 8 tenants, even if I wanted to.

    Aside from all this, I was always told that I was not legally required to accept Section 8, so I was completely under the impression that I could tell applicants that I wasn't going to accept it.

    Out of all of my applicants, I'd say about 15-20% of them asked if I accepted Section 8 vouchers. In all of these scenarios, I kindly replied "Sorry, no vouchers", or "I'm sorry, we're not accepting vouchers at this time". Pretty much everyone was pleasant and said no worries or asked if I knew someone who had a unit who did.

    Some time goes by, I end up renting to a single guy, and all is well in the world. That is, until a few weeks later, I receive 12 notices from New York State Division of Human Rights that a local non-profit have filed 12 complaints against me on behalf of 2 individuals for "discrimination" of source of income. These 2 individuals appear to be a mother/son. They filed 4 complaints jointly, and 4 each individually (12 total). This non-profit specializes in fair housing practices/housing discrimination on Long Island, "Our mission is the elimination of unlawful housing discrimination and promotion of decent and affordable housing through advocacy and education." These complaints read as lawsuits would with the rectangle box on each one with "Complainant vs. Respondents".

    Each complaint is accompanied by a form that I'm supposed to fill out to give my argument against why or why not I discriminated. In addition, the complaints are reading that the non-profit used actual actors/"testers" to reach out to me on these listings to confirm what these 2 individuals were saying was true, which of course, I also replied, "Sorry, no vouchers".

    Now I've had to hire a lawyer who specializes in cases like this, and has actually gone up against this non-profit in the past, but with a much bigger client who owned 20+ apartment buildings, and was also openly saying "no Section 8 vouchers". They ended up settling that case for something like $380k. I had to pay this lawyer a $7,500 retainer for them to even talk to me.

    Obviously this is BS, especially considering out of the 4 units that I have rented, 3 out of 4 of them are occupied by African American tenants, and 1 out of 4 of them are rented to Section 8. Also, I have e-mails going back months with Section 8 stating that I want to go "all-in" and build an entire portfolio around the program. In this scenario, I physically couldn't accept Section 8 because the house didn't have a legal rental permit. My lawyer is hoping to argue that against them but it seems like the most likely route is settlement, which means I'm paying thousands of dollars for nothing. Also, they state that if I'm found to have violated these peoples Human Rights, that I can lose my other Low Income Housing Tax Credits (aka Section 8 at my other property).

    The complaints also state that these individuals suffered "anguish" for

    Even if we decided to fight this, which we probably would have a decent chance at winning, it will cost me thousands in lawyer hourly billings vs. just paying out a settlement to these people.

    At this point, my lawyer has filed an extension with NY Division of Human Rights and should be reaching out to the non-profit behind all of this mess some point soon.

    It sucks because it will be more expensive to fight it and win, than to just take the L and pay them out a settlement. It looks like this lady works for a local homeless shelter, which makes sense how she knew to file the complaint with this specific non-profit the day after it happened. I'm starting to think she does this professionally and is a real estate "ambulance chaser". The complaint also states that they've experienced "anguish" over this ordeal.

    At this point, only time will tell what they want to get out of this whole thing. It's pretty obvious that they want money, but I guess how much, only time will tell. I just wanted to share this story with you guys so you know what you're up against in the current world we live in.

    I'll circle back and update everyone when I have more information or updates.

    Wish me luck. smh.


     So if I am reading this properly, you are operating a property without a proper permit and have an illegal basement rental as well and basically got busted? While I would never invest in NY as James mentions as its the worst - if I was going to do it I would atleast make sure I tried to follow the rules. 

    Lessons I take away from this:

    1. Do not invest in NY

    2. Wherever you do invest, try and play by the rules.It can be a very expensive learning lesson which it looks like this will be. 

    7e investments53 Reviews
  • Corby GoadeBusiness Member
    Investor · Boise, ID · Member since 2014 · 3k+ posts · 3k+ votes
    2y

    Honestly, it's not BS- this is how professional tenants play the game, you need to know the rules. I'm not saying you actually violated any laws or committed any human rights violations, but this is exactly why it's vital to have an objective, documented screening process and publish your criteria on every advertisement for the property that you put out there. 

    It's not a matter of IF you did it, but if you can prove that you didn't. The only way to do that is through a process that you follow every single time and document every single applicant, timestamp them and the communication. 

    I'm sorry you're going through this, but take it as an opportunity to step back and create some structure around what you are doing OR hire a PM who has those in place and will protect you from frivilous lawsuits. 

    Best of luck- let us know how things turn out. 

  • Theresa HarrisPro Member
    Member since 2019 · 15k+ posts · 11k+ votes
    2y

    I don't think you have to accept section 8, but it is how you reply that matters. Also is it considered a room in your house or a separate unit?  Search the BP posts for section 8 questions (keeping in mind what people write is their opinion and it may not be correct).  I think I've read others post that you can say you are not approved to take section 8.

  • Adam BartomeoBusiness Member
    Real Estate Broker · Cape Coral, FL · Member since 2015 · 2k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    2y

    Lesson #1 - NEVER INVEST IN NY! EVER!

    Lesson #2 - Never intentionally do anything illegally! IT WILL COME BACK TO BITE YOU!

  • Russell BrazilBusiness Member
    Moderator
    Real Estate Agent · Washington, D.C. · Member since 2012 · 17k+ posts · 30k+ votes
    2y
    Being a landlord in New York is a special kind of hell I wish on no man. Govt is out of control.
    I'd hardly call this an example of out of control government. There's a list of protected classes. He's responding to multiple inquiries stating he won't take a person from that protected class.  This is not a hard law to follow. The op should have known the law.
  • Real Estate Broker · Cleveland Dayton Cincinnati Toledo Columbus & Akron, OH · Member since 2013 · 31k+ posts · 20k+ votes
    2y
    Quote from @Russell Brazil:
    Being a landlord in New York is a special kind of hell I wish on no man. Govt is out of control.
    I'd hardly call this an example of out of control government. There's a list of protected classes. He's responding to multiple inquiries stating he won't take a person from that protected class.  This is not a hard law to follow. The op should have known the law.

     The fact that being too irresponsible to pay for the roof over your own head is considered a protected class, is in itself, an example of the govt being out of control.

  • Camille T.Pro Member
    Member since 2019 · 45 posts · 33 votes
    2y

    @John S. Thanks for sharing your experience with us. We all learn. All the best resolving it!

  • Real Estate Agent · Virginia Beach, VA · Member since 2012 · 2k+ posts · 1k+ votes
    2y

    If all you have is 2 properties, so less than 4 rented units, why don't you qualify for the exemptions from fair housing, especially if the property that caused all the complaints is the same one you actually live in?  Not a lawyer, so not giving any advice, legal or otherwise. Just curious.  I know that you can't say you won't accept vouchers in states where source of income is protected, but can't you just explain that you said it the wrong way, not intending to discriminate, but it's actually just the home you live in and you know it won't meet Section 8 requirements?  Even the NY Fair Housing page says 4 exceptions, with one of them being "one- or two-unit owner occupied buildings."  https://ag.ny.gov/publications/fair-housing

  • Chicago, IL · Member since 2024 · 17 posts · 9 votes
    2y

    The best advice I could give to not have this happen in the future is always to let the government say no to accepting your property vs. telling a tenant no vouchers are allowed.

  • Member since 2022 · 53 posts · 27 votes
    2y
    Quote from @Lynn McGeein:

    If all you have is 2 properties, so less than 4 rented units, why don't you qualify for the exemptions from fair housing, especially if the property that caused all the complaints is the same one you actually live in?  Not a lawyer, so not giving any advice, legal or otherwise. Just curious.  I know that you can't say you won't accept vouchers in states where source of income is protected, but can't you just explain that you said it the wrong way, not intending to discriminate, but it's actually just the home you live in and you know it won't meet Section 8 requirements?  Even the NY Fair Housing page says 4 exceptions, with one of them being "one- or two-unit owner occupied buildings."  https://ag.ny.gov/publications/fair-housing


     Thank you so much for sending this. I just sent it over to my attorney and will see if this applies to our situation.

  • Investor · Clairemont, CA · Member since 2011 · 3k+ posts · 2k+ votes
    2y

    "Source of income" as a protected class (i.e. Sec 8 voucher recipients) is a pretty well known State specific protection. It's a commonly applied local overlay in the 'usual suspects' of States that have restrictive tenant protections, so its unfortunate that you thought you didn't have to accept it...technically you may not have been required to 'accept the voucher', but you have to allow them the opportunity to apply and then allow the housing office to decline the property. 

    Out of curiosity I just searched the places that include income protections, there are 17 states, 21 counties, and 85 cities that ban source-of-income discrimination as of September 2022 

  • Real Estate Investor · Chico, CA · Member since 2016 · 248 posts · 105 votes
    2y
    Quote from @Matt Devincenzo:

    "Source of income" as a protected class (i.e. Sec 8 voucher recipients) is a pretty well known State specific protection. It's a commonly applied local overlay in the 'usual suspects' of States that have restrictive tenant protections, so its unfortunate that you thought you didn't have to accept it...technically you may not have been required to 'accept the voucher', but you have to allow them the opportunity to apply and then allow the housing office to decline the property. 

    Out of curiosity I just searched the places that include income protections, there are 17 states, 21 counties, and 85 cities that ban source-of-income discrimination as of September 2022 


     This is waaaaaay too much information. 

    Your basement unit is irrelevant to this, and I would just delete that part of your post if I were you.
    I just googled “do I have to accept section 8” and sure enough, in NY you do. 

    I think that’s complete BS!! Some of these housing authorities are tyrants!! Inspectors on power trips and not picking. Nope not me. 

    moral of the story is that you have to either not respond or say yes and don’t mean it. 


    the rest of your story is so self incriminating that I’d just delete it all if I were you. 
  • Rental Property Investor · Denver, CO · Member since 2018 · 14 posts · 19 votes
    2y

    @John S. I wouldn’t have wrote this post if I were you. I am a lawyer and this looks like you are admitting to breaking the law.

  • Real Estate Agent · Chicago, IL · Member since 2017 · 2k+ posts · 2k+ votes
    2y

    Check your local laws. In IL we are allowed to discriminate in certain ways on small owner occupied buildings, it is a completely different set of laws to larger buildings. No idea what New York allows though as heard it is very pro-tenant. You may be fully in the clear though if your states laws exempt owner occupied buildings. 

    FYI for other landlords. Never say you don't accept sec 8. Just let the applicant apply and use the same qualification criteria which they rarely will pass. 

  • Alecia LovelessPro Member
    Member since 2019 · 3k+ posts · 2k+ votes
    2y

    @John S. I will never invest in NY, OR, WA, or CA for this very reason.

    On another note I invite everyone to apply and then evaluate the applications as opposed to saying No Vouchers or no Section 8.

  • Don KonipolBusiness Member
    Investor · The Woodlands TX / Avon, CT · Member since 2009 · 6k+ posts · 10k+ votes
    2y

    Investing in rental property in NYC and NYS be very profitable for 2 kinds of investors, very large investors owning 150 unit or more apartment buildings that aren’t in the rent stabilization program and very small investors owning duplexes and living in one of the units. For anyone else there are 3 rules for investing in residential property in NY.

    1. Never invest in residential property in NY
    2, Never invest in residential property in NY

    and if you forget 1 or 2 above then

    3. Never invest in residential property in NY

    NY and Cal and many other states are driven by wealth redistribution from property owners to tenants, not private property rights.  

    Private Mortgage Financing Partners, LLC
  • Real Estate Investor · Chico, CA · Member since 2016 · 248 posts · 105 votes
    2y

    I just checked Maine where most of my LTRs are and it’s the same!! 
    I think this is going to be in most states. 
    good information and we should all (continue to be) careful about this going forward!

  • Investor · TX · Member since 2018 · 57 posts · 28 votes
    2y

    Unfortunately, providing low-income housing in a state like New York is not just a thankless job - it is the kind of job where you will get kicked in the teeth, knocked on the ground, stomped on, p*ssed on, and then left for dead afterwards. Nobody will ever respect you for the blood, sweat, and tears you will go through dealing with all of the pain and agony of trying to navigate such a ridiculous system. I say leave and never go back. The state is falling apart, particularly NYC, and until rule of law is restored, it will only get worse.

  • Severna Park, MD · Member since 2013 · 7k+ posts · 7k+ votes
    2y

    When I get asked if I take vouchers or section 8 , I tell the person that the house hasnt passed a section 8 inspection . They ask when i will get it inspected , and I tell them when I get a qualified applicant I will schedule it . The person tells me it takes about a month and a half  to get scheduled . I tell them I dont have anyone who has applied and met the qualifications  so there is no reason to do so until that happens .  And I have had them apply , but I require good credit 670 and above for all my properties .

  • Don KonipolBusiness Member
    Investor · The Woodlands TX / Avon, CT · Member since 2009 · 6k+ posts · 10k+ votes
    2y
    Quote from @Account Closed:

    Unfortunately, providing low-income housing in a state like New York is not just a thankless job - it is the kind of job where you will get kicked in the teeth, knocked on the ground, stomped on, p*ssed on, and then left for dead afterwards. Nobody will ever respect you for the blood, sweat, and tears you will go through dealing with all of the pain and agony of trying to navigate such a ridiculous system. I say leave and never go back. The state is falling apart, particularly NYC, and until rule of law is restored, it will only get worse.

    During the 1977 World Series at Yankee Stadium, fires of building burning could be seen in the background, with Howard Cosell announcing that the Bronx was burning.  This was not the case of vandals burning abandoned buildings, nor the case of landlords burning building to collect insurance.  This was landlords burning their building because the city had obtained a court order REQUIRING landlords to continue to support and operate money losing apartment building.  In other words they were not allowed to terminate the money losing business (apartments) they were it; they were required by a court to continue to run their business and continue to lose money!  So they handed each tenant $500 to leave the building for “48” hours, and arranged to have the building burned down.  Btw, prior, the city and state would NOT foreclose for property tax nor accept the building as a gift; the government just determined that these property owners must become economic “slaves” to the government.  
    Another BTW, the state of NY determined in 1947 that a temporary housing crisis existed in NYC.  That designation of “crisis” has been renewed without fail every three years and so the “temporary” crisis has existed continuously for 77 years.  Don’t expect any changes in property” rights anytime soon. 

    Private Mortgage Financing Partners, LLC
  • Real Estate Agent · Chicago, IL · Member since 2017 · 2k+ posts · 2k+ votes
    2y

    Are you sure the lawsuits even have any ground? A lot of these pro tenant non-profits just mail out hundreds of these to see if can get payouts. "In the state of New York, anti-discrimination laws cover most types of housing, with four main exceptions:one- or two-family owner-occupied buildings. room rentals in housing for individuals of the same sex, such as college dormitories or boarding houses where all residents are of the same sex."

  • Investor · Pittsburgh, PA · Member since 2023 · 109 posts · 58 votes
    2y

    All I'm reading is "did illegal stuff and got caught..."

    Why not just do better?

  • Member since 2022 · 53 posts · 27 votes
    2y
    Quote from @Cory St. Esprit:

    All I'm reading is "did illegal stuff and got caught..."

    Why not just do better?


     because I can't satisfy the town's requirements to keep the house owner-occupied. Every unit is safe and would pass inspection, I'm just getting screwed by government red tape..

Join the conversationCreate a free account to reply, vote on answers and follow this thread.