Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Land & New Construction
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 2 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

472
Posts
238
Votes
David Friedman
Property Manager
Pro Member
  • Property Manager
  • San Bernardino, CA
238
Votes |
472
Posts

Asked to Develop 80 Units on Religious Property

David Friedman
Property Manager
Pro Member
  • Property Manager
  • San Bernardino, CA
Posted

Hello BP,

I've been asked by a religious organization that owns several acres of land to help them develop an 80+ unit, 55+ community.

I've never developed on "Tax Exempt" religious property before and I'm not sure the best way to go about this.

The goal of the religious organization is to provide income to their organization from the rent and thus creating long-term sustainability for their organization. At the same time, they want to provide housing opportunities for their community.

They are looking to us to bring capital, construction financing, construction company (Basically everything).

Some questions I have for BP:

1. Is the best vehicle for this partnership going to be a JV?

2. If they do not want to split off the land from their place of worship, will that be an issue? I'm guessing the lender and investors will want this as its own separate parcel. (This one is really stumping me).

3. If the religious organization has some capital, but not a lot, and you are expected to bring the rest of the equity as well as everything else that comes with developing, what is a fair split to bring our development skills and resources to the table? Fees? Equity? How much?

4. From a moral viewpoint, I'm not sure if I want to own equity with a religious organization. I don't think I have it in me to foreclose or sue them unless they were extremely malicious in their actions towards me.

Thank you for any advice you can give!

  • David Friedman

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

105
Posts
58
Votes
Paul H.
  • Developer
  • Ottawa, Ontario
58
Votes |
105
Posts
Paul H.
  • Developer
  • Ottawa, Ontario
Replied

Just some thoughts:

1. You can call it a JV, but I would assume a GP/LP structure may work best. The last thing you want is a power struggle and not have control of the project.

2. You would have to go through planning anyways to plat the project, I suspect the best way would be to break away, however will the zoning and tax designations change?

3. Work backwards and do some residual land value on the entirety of the project. You could put their land contribution on the LP side and keep a 30/70 split or whatever works.

4. Proper Structure, try to have them contribute the land on the LP side, and then control the project.  If it's treated like a normal project (regardless of the religious partner) everything you should be clean and laid out like a normal development.  The problem I see in this, is that they are asking you to do everything, but yet want to remain in control of everything. If they want to be on the GP side, maybe they need to bring more to the table than just dirt.  Seems like further discussion would be required and with 80 units, it may be too small on the buy and hold side to really get property management covered properly amongst other things being  a bit smaller and new.

Loading replies...