Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Multi-Family and Apartment Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

162
Posts
43
Votes
David S.
  • Investor
  • Bay Area, CA
43
Votes |
162
Posts

MF Syndication Involving Large Institutional Partner

David S.
  • Investor
  • Bay Area, CA
Posted

Let's say that I found a MF Syndication Offering that seems to check most boxes for my investment criteria. The sponsor is well experienced, the value-add MF project will be moderately leveraged with long term fixed rate debt and the underwriting seems conservative. However, in addition to the sponsor’s equity and the equity contributed by regular LP investors like me, there will be an investment fund that will take a majority interest that will significantly outweigh the equity position of the sponsor and the small (lets say retail) limited partners like myself.

Under this scenario, on the one hand, I kind of view this as additional endorsement of the deal. On the other hand, the institutional investor has major decision making power including choosing when to sell the property. There is also some kind of buy-sell shotgun provision that would allow them to take out the regular LP investors at then fair market value at any time after x number of years. One of my concerns is if the value add does not work out or the deal starts to slide due to a recession or other reason, the institutional partner could decide to sell without letting the other limited partners have a say (say via a vote) and thereby force us to sell at a depressed valuation since it would be unlikely we would have the ability to raise sufficient equity to buyout the institutional partner at that time. Another concern is that once the execution risk of the value add has been completed, the institution could decide to buy us out and thereby not allow us to enjoy the full benefits from the value add.

Is my concern that the institutional partner’s interest may not always be aligned with my own interests legitimate or should I take comfort in that they also see this as a deal worth investing in?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

4,908
Posts
13,015
Votes
Mike Dymski
#5 Investor Mindset Contributor
  • Investor
  • Greenville, SC
13,015
Votes |
4,908
Posts
Mike Dymski
#5 Investor Mindset Contributor
  • Investor
  • Greenville, SC
Replied

Your concerns are very valid.  None of the other boxes matter if you are uncomfortable with your partner and interests are not aligned.  Address your concerns with the sponsor and move forward or move on.  Take-outs are as important as it gets and deal breakers for many sophisticated LPs.

Loading replies...