Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Multi-Family and Apartment Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 6 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

162
Posts
43
Votes
David S.
  • Investor
  • Bay Area, CA
43
Votes |
162
Posts

MF Syndication Involving Large Institutional Partner

David S.
  • Investor
  • Bay Area, CA
Posted

Let's say that I found a MF Syndication Offering that seems to check most boxes for my investment criteria. The sponsor is well experienced, the value-add MF project will be moderately leveraged with long term fixed rate debt and the underwriting seems conservative. However, in addition to the sponsor’s equity and the equity contributed by regular LP investors like me, there will be an investment fund that will take a majority interest that will significantly outweigh the equity position of the sponsor and the small (lets say retail) limited partners like myself.

Under this scenario, on the one hand, I kind of view this as additional endorsement of the deal. On the other hand, the institutional investor has major decision making power including choosing when to sell the property. There is also some kind of buy-sell shotgun provision that would allow them to take out the regular LP investors at then fair market value at any time after x number of years. One of my concerns is if the value add does not work out or the deal starts to slide due to a recession or other reason, the institutional partner could decide to sell without letting the other limited partners have a say (say via a vote) and thereby force us to sell at a depressed valuation since it would be unlikely we would have the ability to raise sufficient equity to buyout the institutional partner at that time. Another concern is that once the execution risk of the value add has been completed, the institution could decide to buy us out and thereby not allow us to enjoy the full benefits from the value add.

Is my concern that the institutional partner’s interest may not always be aligned with my own interests legitimate or should I take comfort in that they also see this as a deal worth investing in?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

4,912
Posts
13,018
Votes
Mike Dymski
#5 Investor Mindset Contributor
  • Investor
  • Greenville, SC
13,018
Votes |
4,912
Posts
Mike Dymski
#5 Investor Mindset Contributor
  • Investor
  • Greenville, SC
Replied

Your concerns are very valid.  None of the other boxes matter if you are uncomfortable with your partner and interests are not aligned.  Address your concerns with the sponsor and move forward or move on.  Take-outs are as important as it gets and deal breakers for many sophisticated LPs.

Loading replies...