Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Multi-Family and Apartment Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 7 years ago,

User Stats

101
Posts
63
Votes
Michael Klinger
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Rancho Mirage, CA
63
Votes |
101
Posts

Rational approach to multi-family physical inspection?

Michael Klinger
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Rancho Mirage, CA
Posted

What would fellow investors say is a rational approach to having a (say) 50+ unit building inspected?

I am not particularly interested in knowing about loose outlet covers and those kinds of nit-picks I've seen in inspector reports. I would like to know if the roof or if the mechanicals are all going to die tomorrow.

Would you have a random sample of units inspected? Rather than every single units. Cost/time being the consideration.

Also, do you typically personally tour every unit? Is that normal/rational? Or overkill?

Loading replies...