Multi-Family and Apartment Investing
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies

Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal



Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated over 8 years ago on . Most recent reply
Is this partnership structure unreasonable?
Friend of mine and I are trying to form a partnership relationship hoping to acquire a small multifamily property (20 units or fewer as long as price is $1 million or less).
My responsibilities:
1. Will be sponsor and responsible for obtaining loan on the property.
2. Will be responsible for finding, analyzing and acquiring deal.
3. Property will be managed by a property management company. I will oversee the property management company and also make any day to day decisions as needed.
Friend responsibilities:
1. Provide cash for down payment. (and possibly some fund for reserves – details yet to be worked out)
2. Silent partner
This is a very high level view of the partnership. Most of the details will still need to be worked out. I am thinking 50/50 equity partnership, which I think would be acceptable to him as well. Does this sound reasonable? If not, then what would be a reasonable split? If the initial property works out well, we are planning to do more deals (hopefully bigger and better). Please let me know your suggestions/thoughts.
Most Popular Reply

@Kazi R. congrats on setting your sights on getting a multifamily property done. What you described is a security and it needs to be registered with the SEC. Anytime you have a passive partner then they are expecting returns based on the mgmt experience which means it's a security. That can be costly and probably cost prohibitive given the size of your proposed deal.
Therefore, I recommend doing a JV as you described, however, your friend would need to be in on the mgmt decisions alongside with you. Assuming that happens, then the 50/50 split certainly seems reasonable.