Skip to content

Let's keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter for timely insights and actionable tips on your real estate journey.

By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Followed Discussions Followed Categories Followed People Followed Locations
Commercial Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

User Stats

60
Posts
44
Votes
Adam Lendi
  • Investor
  • CO
44
Votes |
60
Posts

Waterfall Structures in Syndicate Investments

Adam Lendi
  • Investor
  • CO
Posted

Looking for advice from experienced syndicators on what works best to attract investors. My partner and I are investing in RV parks and bringing investors into our next deal.

We are analyzing the parks now using an 8.5% pref and a 65/35 waterfall. We want to give our investors great returns and while I feel this is a generous structure, I'm curious to hear from those with experience. Is this too generous? Is there something that works better? Are two tiered models too confusing?

Thanks in advance!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

2,855
Posts
1,958
Votes
Charles Carillo
  • Rental Property Investor
  • North Palm Beach, FL
1,958
Votes |
2,855
Posts
Charles Carillo
  • Rental Property Investor
  • North Palm Beach, FL
Replied

@Adam Lendi

It really depends on the specific deal and how much work is required in the business plan. Typically, you will see a 7% or 8% pref and a 70/30 split. What returns have you floated to your investors? What was their reaction? 

Loading replies...