Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 3 years ago,

User Stats

5
Posts
1
Votes
Justin Stawarz
1
Votes |
5
Posts

Seeking Advice: Seller did not disclose zoning violations

Justin Stawarz
Posted

I've been under contract on a house in Kansas for a couple of weeks now. I've been researching tax deed properties and decided to look into my future home. Upon fulling code violation records I was surprised to find that the seller was within a grace period to correct a significant zoning violation. The seller was cited for the violation late last year and personally appeared to appeal the variance with the city's Board of Zoning appeals a few months ago and lost, so I'm certain they knew of the violation. They claimed on the disclosure that no violations of laws or regulations regarding the property, or litigation, and claimed no material alterations were made. The variance was due to work that the seller themselves had performed on the property early last year.

 To further complicate matters the seller claimed (through their agent) that the issue had been all cleared up and that it would be fine, when I asked for documentation they stated they had a letter but couldn't find it but would get back to us within a couple days. The deadline came and went and still no letter, they then claimed that they were working with the Deputy Director of Public works to resolve the issue (I'm not sure what they would do that would supersede a decision by the zoning board). We asked for a price reduction to cover the cost of repairs, which they verbally agreed to (again all through their agent). A few days later when their time was up the seller just flat out said they hadn't heard anything from the city and that they were no longer going to agree to our price reduction, but that the seller would repair it themselves to my specifications. Since they've lied multiple times at this point, and di not do the work correctly the first time, I am not inclined to make any deal that involves them performing work on the property.

At this point the deal will very likely fall through, I'd value opinions from anyone who has faced similar situations. I'm considering filing a small claims court for my expenses prior to discovering the zoning variance, which include inspections and quotes from contractors for initial fixes that were needed (which they also knew about and did not disclose). At this point I'd also like to see about adding in time, travel and other missed opportunities, though I'm not sure small claims would be ideal for hashing these out. I do want the house, it's rather hard to find anything in this particular neighborhood, which I put significant value on. Any thoughts on how to move forward would be valued.

Loading replies...