Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Justin Stawarz

Justin Stawarz has started 2 posts and replied 5 times.

Originally posted by @Caleb Brown:

Ah yea. Pretty significant. It needs fixed right or concessions if not walk. Is the deal on MLS or off market?

It's MLS, that's pretty much what we we're thinking too. At this point I'm really just trying to figure the best way to recoup my costs.

Thank you for the advice!

Originally posted by @Caleb Brown:

@Justin Stawarz

What’s the zoning violation? Also are you within your inspection period or past it?

I don't want to be too specific but it's an exterior alteration that would require at least $7500 to fix. After losing the appeal the seller was given 6 months to correct the issue, which will expire any day now. After that I believe inspections will resume. 

I've been under contract on a house in Kansas for a couple of weeks now. I've been researching tax deed properties and decided to look into my future home. Upon fulling code violation records I was surprised to find that the seller was within a grace period to correct a significant zoning violation. The seller was cited for the violation late last year and personally appeared to appeal the variance with the city's Board of Zoning appeals a few months ago and lost, so I'm certain they knew of the violation. They claimed on the disclosure that no violations of laws or regulations regarding the property, or litigation, and claimed no material alterations were made. The variance was due to work that the seller themselves had performed on the property early last year.

 To further complicate matters the seller claimed (through their agent) that the issue had been all cleared up and that it would be fine, when I asked for documentation they stated they had a letter but couldn't find it but would get back to us within a couple days. The deadline came and went and still no letter, they then claimed that they were working with the Deputy Director of Public works to resolve the issue (I'm not sure what they would do that would supersede a decision by the zoning board). We asked for a price reduction to cover the cost of repairs, which they verbally agreed to (again all through their agent). A few days later when their time was up the seller just flat out said they hadn't heard anything from the city and that they were no longer going to agree to our price reduction, but that the seller would repair it themselves to my specifications. Since they've lied multiple times at this point, and di not do the work correctly the first time, I am not inclined to make any deal that involves them performing work on the property.

At this point the deal will very likely fall through, I'd value opinions from anyone who has faced similar situations. I'm considering filing a small claims court for my expenses prior to discovering the zoning variance, which include inspections and quotes from contractors for initial fixes that were needed (which they also knew about and did not disclose). At this point I'd also like to see about adding in time, travel and other missed opportunities, though I'm not sure small claims would be ideal for hashing these out. I do want the house, it's rather hard to find anything in this particular neighborhood, which I put significant value on. Any thoughts on how to move forward would be valued.

Originally posted by @Alex Olson:

you talking ks or kansas city for your single family home sale?

 Kansas City, Kansas. The Wyandotte/Johnson county area mostly.

I'm currently reviewing a number of properties that are due to be auctioned off in August-October in a couple of different counties in Kansas. Kansas is a tax deed state and seems pretty straight forward compared to many of states. My main question is, how close to their actual value to single family homes usually sell for at tax auction? I know this will very widely based on the market, but assuming that the home is occupied and in reasonable condition would I really be getting much of a deal after budgeting for current year taxes, eviction costs, fee's and assessments ect? I'm really just trying to fine out if I'm pursuing a pipe dream by going after these. I would love to hear from someone with experience in tax sales, any advice on tax deed sales in general is greatly appreciated as well. Thanks!