Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 13 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

45
Posts
12
Votes
Trevor Lybbert
  • Specialist
  • Olympia, WA
12
Votes |
45
Posts

How does subject to deals work with buy and hold rentals?

Trevor Lybbert
  • Specialist
  • Olympia, WA
Posted

I'm really interested in doing some subject to deals. And I've been seeing a lot of strategies for buying and refinancing after a year or two, but what are some examples of getting a property subject to, and renting it out for the long haul?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

13,450
Posts
8,349
Votes
Steve Babiak
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Audubon, PA
8,349
Votes |
13,450
Posts
Steve Babiak
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Audubon, PA
Replied
Originally posted by Bryan Hancock:
It happens all of the time. You need to make sure the buyer is informed about your intentions though. Subject-to purchases can have various exit strategies.

Maybe you meant to say seller there instead?

Loading replies...