Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

186
Posts
173
Votes
Audrey Ezeh
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Las Cruces, NM
173
Votes |
186
Posts

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

942
Posts
1,708
Votes
Arlen Chou
  • Investor
  • Los Altos, CA
1,708
Votes |
942
Posts
Arlen Chou
  • Investor
  • Los Altos, CA
Replied

@Wes Blackwell as you know I am interested in the Sacramento area, but for reasons that are not really relevant to this topic.  @Amit M. as you know I am deep into the buy and hold strategy in the Bay Area.  Both areas have interesting opportunities, but they are geared for different types of investors.  I fully believe that there is money to be made in both markets.  But I think it is incorrect to base a decision on the idea of "tech" workers migrating of of the BA and the Bay Area only being a 1 industry town.

There was a string of posts on this topic last year, but I feel it is important to educate our fellow BP'ers that the term "tech workers" is not a single class of employees but a very WIDE catch all phrase that encompasses everything from bio-tech to chip design to aerospace etc, etc, etc.  These very different industries do not move in lock step, nor are they effected by the same macroeconomic factors.  As an example a software "tech engineer" can write code for Google, Amazon, Tesla, Salesforce.com, airBnB, Uber or any other countless companies.  The point being that the primary industry for each one of my examples is completely different but the "tech" skill set of the software engineer is applicable in all industries.  The easy fall back is to say; "sure that is for a software engineer".  However, it applies to hardware, electrical, design and a plethora of other "tech engineering" careers.

The real point is that the "high tech" of today will be the "low tech" of tomorrow.  As that "high technology business slowly slides into "low tech" side of the scale, corporations will look for ways to minimize costs because they will no longer be the "it" company and pulling the giant PE ratios.  This will drive jobs out of the core BA.  But it would be a mistake to believe that NEW "high tech" won't fill the voids and along with those new technologies will be a new army of "tech engineers".

My point is that jobs will move to Sacramento but jobs will also be created in the BA.  So I guess my point is that both of you guys are right for different reasons ;-) kumbaya

Loading replies...