Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Buying & Selling Real Estate
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 11 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

61
Posts
2
Votes
Michael Krassos
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Dumont, NJ
2
Votes |
61
Posts

Need Help: What does it mean when my Cash-on-Cash percentage is lower than my Cap Rate?

Michael Krassos
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Dumont, NJ
Posted

Stay away I imagine, but seriously I'm analyzing a deal and want to make sure I understand what is happening.

It's a 2-family to buy and hold for $400,000, will put down 25%, so mortgage at $300,000.
Income is $45,600/Year
Expenses is $24,680(Taxes, Insurance, Utilities, reserves for vacancies and repair)
So NOI is $20,920.

After Mortgage is paid I have a seamingly attractive Cash Flow of $355, that's $177.45 per door!!

After factoring in my Cost to Purchase of $4838....

My cap rate is at 6.15% (I consider okay for NJ and condition of property), and my CoC is 4.74%!

What's is happening? Why is the CoC lower than my Cap Rate? Is this a deal or not?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

308
Posts
230
Votes
Giovanni Isaksen
  • Investor
  • Bellingham, WA
230
Votes |
308
Posts
Giovanni Isaksen
  • Investor
  • Bellingham, WA
Replied

@Michael Krassos It may or may not be a bad deal just because it is negatively leveraged. If you acquired all cash you would earn a higher return but if it's not possible to go in with no debt then the deal deserves extra scrutiny because your margin of safety would be thinner. Extra care should be given to the state of the neighborhood and it's future prospects as well as making sure the repairs and expenses are nailed down. I would especially want to understand any deferred maintenance and future capex needs.

Loading replies...