Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Mobile Home Park Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 1 year ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

16
Posts
1
Votes
Dan Oakley
  • Hamburg, NJ
1
Votes |
16
Posts

legal non-conforming status

Dan Oakley
  • Hamburg, NJ
Posted

Hey all,  I am looking at a park that has a legal non-conforming designation.  The reason being lot size.  Minimum required is 20,000sq/ft per home as of 2001. Nearly half an acre.  The park was finished in the late nineties so the regulation are not a violation but how would you proceed?  Does it make you think differently about the overall prospects of the park or is it just something that comes with the territory of changes to   zoning and permitted uses?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

3,125
Posts
2,637
Votes
Matt Devincenzo
  • Investor
  • Clairemont, CA
2,637
Votes |
3,125
Posts
Matt Devincenzo
  • Investor
  • Clairemont, CA
Replied

As with many things...it depends. An underlying question on a legal non-conforming use is what does the code say as it relates to continuing the use in the event of 1) extended vacancy 2) destruction or loss (fire, flood etc) 3) additional changes or improvements to the site. 

1) If you fail to use it as a MHP for some time do you lose your ability to then begin again? If so how long is that timeframe, or what other conditions could also trigger that section of the code? 

2) It's fairly typical that a loss such as fire etc, could eliminate your ability to rebuild. First what threshold of loss triggers this code? Is it only a total loss, greater than 50%, or any loss cannot be rebuilt? So if you lose 1 of 10 trailers to a fire is that now a total loss forever?

3) What restrictions to improving the site are you accepting? There may be allowance in the zoning code for a MHP zoning to have an accessory structure for a club house (for example). But if your property doesn't already have one are you allowed to build one per the existing 'non-conforming' zoning? Or is that considered an intensification of the non-conforming use and prohibited by the code? 

The answers to all of the above may indicate a longer term negative pressure on the value since you may not be able to continue the use. So it's accounting for that either in the actual purchase price, or by ensuring that the new zoning use is at least equal in value to what you expect to achieve with the MHP if you were to have a loss of your non-conforming use. 

Loading replies...