Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 4 years ago,

User Stats

1,611
Posts
1,359
Votes
Jimmy Lieu
Agent
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Columbus, OH
1,359
Votes |
1,611
Posts

Would using a subcontractor be cheaper than a general contractor?

Jimmy Lieu
Agent
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Columbus, OH
Posted

Hi,

I always read about people using general contractors and etc. However, because most general contractors actually just hire subcontractors and just manage the project, wouldn't it be cheaper to rather directly hire subcontractors ourselves?

By basically cutting out the middleman, wouldn't you save on a lot more money?

I am wondering what you guys think about this and if this is true or not.

business profile image
Jimmy Lieu, Swiss Realty Group
5.0 stars
58 Reviews
business profile image
Swiss Realty Group
5.0 stars
58 Reviews

Loading replies...