Starting Out
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated over 7 years ago,
Starting with large(r) buildings?
I'm not new to owning real estate, but I'm still new to investing in real estate. As such, I don't want to claim that my strategy is set in stone, but I'm currently thinking that I'd like to acquire income producing properties that I could hold long-term to generate passive income. I'm also starting to wonder if buying a large building in another state is a reasonable way to start, or if this is some ridiculous pie-in-the-sky strategy for a newbie investor.
Here are the factors driving my thoughts:
1) I currently have no debt, $240K in available cash, a home that is owned free and clear, and a reasonable/stable income at my regular job. This encourages me to believe that I might be able to start with a larger building.
2) I'd like to invest locally, but the local "deals" here in Denver don't really seem to have numbers that add up for the investment strategy I outlined above (Denver is booming right now, and near me a property with a $375-400K purchase price might rent for just $2,000-2,300/mo).
3) Going out of state on a first investment scares me, but I believe I could somewhat smooth that risk and better afford to have a property professionally managed if I started with a larger building (maybe 10+ units?). The challenge I see here is understanding the regional/local market dynamics of an area where I don't live, and finding the right management partner in that area.
Again, nothing is set in stone for me at the moment... when I first joined this forum I was convinced I was going to invest in local single family homes as rental properties. I haven't found any enticing deals locally (at least for that strategy), and I'm trying to broaden my real estate investment horizons at the moment.
Any thoughts?
Thanks!