Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Starting Out
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

52
Posts
29
Votes
Kevin H.
  • Arvada, CO
29
Votes |
52
Posts

Starting with large(r) buildings?

Kevin H.
  • Arvada, CO
Posted

I'm not new to owning real estate, but I'm still new to investing in real estate.  As such, I don't want to claim that my strategy is set in stone, but I'm currently thinking that I'd like to acquire income producing properties that I could hold long-term to generate passive income.  I'm also starting to wonder if buying a large building in another state is a reasonable way to start, or if this is some ridiculous pie-in-the-sky strategy for a newbie investor. 

Here are the factors driving my thoughts:

1) I currently have no debt, $240K in available cash, a home that is owned free and clear, and a reasonable/stable income at my regular job.  This encourages me to believe that I might be able to start with a larger building.

2) I'd like to invest locally, but the local "deals" here in Denver don't really seem to have numbers that add up for the investment strategy I outlined above (Denver is booming right now, and near me a property with a $375-400K purchase price might rent for just $2,000-2,300/mo). 

3) Going out of state on a first investment scares me, but I believe I could somewhat smooth that risk and better afford to have a property professionally managed if I started with a larger building (maybe 10+ units?).  The challenge I see here is understanding the regional/local market dynamics of an area where I don't live, and finding the right management partner in that area. 

Again, nothing is set in stone for me at the moment...  when I first joined this forum I was convinced I was going to invest in local single family homes as rental properties.  I haven't found any enticing deals locally (at least for that strategy), and I'm trying to broaden my real estate investment horizons at the moment.  

Any thoughts? 

Thanks!   

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

4,417
Posts
2,892
Votes
Bill S.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Denver, CO
2,892
Votes |
4,417
Posts
Bill S.
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Denver, CO
ModeratorReplied

@Kevin H. so I don't have an answer for you but I would be remiss if I didn't point out the glaring obvious. In the last three years while you waited on the sidelines you missed out on $100K in appreciation and another $60k in rents (assuming a purchase of a $300k property appreciating at 10% per year renting at $2,000 per month). Even if you had purchased of one of those "...bidding wars, lightning quick sales, or overpriced piles of crap". Or on the other hand, you also missed out on the cash flow of say 10% cash on cash (conservative - $60K on a $200k investment) with an all cash turnkey in some yet to be determined mid-west market. In short you need to pull the trigger as you are currently in a state of analysis paralysis and it's costing you real money! You have money to deploy and are not doing so, to your own financial loss. 

Personally I would rather own a property here in Denver in 20 year or 40 years than some mid-west rust belt city but each to their own. Pick a plan and execute it. Perhaps you are wrong but you are obviously careful and I seriously doubt you will pick a dog. Whatever you decide, find the best quality you can and go with it. In 40 years, you will laugh at how little you paid for real estate here in Denver. I just looked at an off market 5 unit property. The owner paid $74,000 for it 40 years ago. Now it is easily worth 10x that and they collected rents for 40 years. It's really hard to make a mistake in this area when you have the long view in mind (20 plus years). So what if the market goes flat or declines for 5 years. As long as you don't have to sell or you don't get tired of owning and sell it doesn't matter. Personally I seriously doubt that the market will decline for 5 years but there is nothing to say it won't continue to increase for another 5 years either. There is no certainty in the future in either direction. 

As my Dad says "Do something, even if it is wrong"

  • Bill S.
  • Loading replies...