Seems like they have a big overlap in functionality.  

@Andrew Steffens agree that there are overlapping features hot tub and soaking tub in the bathroom.

Having too many will cause for overlapping of properties and then it goes to procuring cause in which one gets paid. 

Most traditional property managers don’t handle this setup due to challenges like managing tenant disputes, coordinating overlapping move-ins/outs, and the risk of Fair Housing violations when selecting tenants.

There is too much overlap between them and they are starting to sound like one and the same, especially since BP has the same host for both. 

When you own a couple of units, the odds of there being unexpected vacancies that overlap each other are usually low, but when you acquire more and more real estate, the odds of tenants moving out around similar times increases. 

Day traders are not exempt unless they elect mark-to-market (MTM) accounting, which eliminates wash sale tracking but taxes gains as ordinary income.To manage taxes, track trades closely, avoid overlapping purchases, or consider MTM election if trading actively.

I’m also a newbie to commercial real estate, focusing on multifamily, but I’ve found that many principles overlap across asset types.

Simplify the structure as much as possible, have clear roles and responsibilities that are not overlapping (meaning only one person is allowed to make certain decisions) and a clearly defined exit plan.

I imagine a lot of the reasons will overlap with the previous topic.