Yet he has fewer votes than his counterparts in this thread.

-- depends on your risk appetite but leverage can certainly pour gasoline on your real estate investment fire in both a good or a bad way. 

Because just like everything else - computers, cell phones, gasoline engines, they are becoming smaller, more powerful, and more efficient. 

That's like throwing your money into a can of gasoline and hoping it survives a possible spark. 

I bet ya all the water used in the current gasoline/diesel/ethanol process would offset a big chunk of that annual water use for hydrogen. 

The only cost is the price of gasoline to drive there.

You seem to enjoy fueling fires with all that gasoline.

Make more money, buy more buildings, and repeat.These folks have compounded their wealth significantly faster than their W2 counterparts since they don't lose 30-50% to taxes each year.

The syndicators then charge fees that are much higher than their institutional counterparts such as 5% acquisition fees, asset management fees, disposition fees, etc...).Are you able to draw any parallels between the mortgage brokers/banks of 2008, Juul, and elderly scammers to the syndicators?

Imagine making millions of dollars throughout your career and then having to pay Uncle Sam 30-50% every year instead of compounding that cash over time.This is exactly what real estate professionals have learned to mitigate.To reduce their taxable income, they buy a building every year, do a cost seg, and use depreciation to reduce their tax liability dramatically.Their personal wealth snowball grows much larger and much faster than their W2 counterparts who give most of their money back to the government each year.Following this strategy as a real estate professional is one of the best ways to end up with a much larger net worth at the end of your career.