My guess is the intent behind knowing this to prevent house prices from running up uncontrollably like they did in the late 2000s. 

From a building owner point of view, I wouldn't do it unless there were financial advantages, because I can envision a whole list of cons:court injunctions preventing you from emptying the building to do something with itlawsuits by the advocacy and others because of [insert issue here]insurance considerationsgeneral lack of oversight and lawlessnessETCIf I owned a building, the only way I would do this is if the building was junk anyway, some third party was leasing it from me, and I was legally absolved of any responsibility whatsoever in the operation.

I really want to prevent the property to go to auction because (1) I do not have the cash for it and (2) I think I will get outbid. 

The better practice is not to notarizefor a spouse or family member in order to preserve the integrity of the notarization and to prevent a challenge to the notarization.Get a lawyer to write a letter. 

Meaning, what if anything could I do to keep my 30 year fixed rate and prevent someone from going after me personally?

I think you’re creating unnecessary headaches with so many bank accounts and LLCs.

I understand I can do work to prevent further damage.

If you try to "beat the system" by getting the property sold the next day (at whatever additional price that would allow you to profit from it) after sniggering at SPS for accepting such a low pay off, I'm suggesting you would only have yourself to blame if they suddenly wake up and add an Addendum at the last moment that would prevent you from carrying out your profit wishes (ie.

Some areas with generous tenant rights prevent the unit from being leased out a certain period of time after an eviction. that could add to costly vacancy in addition to attorney fees. 

Have you heard about CPTED (crime prevention through environmental design)?