
7 June 2012 | 17 replies
But in this case I think I'd compare these programs to what comes out of the back end of a bull rather than chocolate chip cookies.Sorry, but I am very negative on these programs.

5 June 2012 | 3 replies
You need to see what comparable properties are actually selling for in the last 6 months.

14 March 2014 | 6 replies
Im aware of CCIM courses but they seem like overkill for my purposes.

11 July 2012 | 10 replies
The bank said this morning they are still deciding on what to do (which means they will probably take the short sale, compared to foreclosure)But how can I get out of the mortgage deficiency?

10 July 2012 | 8 replies
The IRS will have an imputed interest rate on any note or installment contract for tax purposes, she would have to be a non-profit for the IRS not to place an interest on such a transaction.This just shouts preditory schemes to me, as to how you can end up with a property after the seller dies and stop paying....In all of this time spent trying to answer your questions I'm really disappointed to see that you have not come further than you have indicated, seems many of us have been wasting our time.

11 July 2012 | 14 replies
However, if this sale is financed by a land contract or a mortgage to seller, and insurance proceeds shall be held in trust for the sole purpose of restoring the property.So, is the damage greater or less than 5% of your purchase price?

15 July 2012 | 16 replies
to stay local, but since Brian Levredge and J Scott are doing it long-distance I'm keeping an open mind.Investing in rentals out-of-state makes sense to me if you live in an area where rentals just don't cash flow compared to other areas, but is the flip situation similar?

31 July 2012 | 18 replies
Just wanted to post this quote from an article I read, although I think banks are still ignoring it (as common sense does dictate main goal should be to make sure you are making a good loan that won't default, not that you are not penalized for making a bad loan), regarding it not affecting their default numbers: Banks didn't want their Compare Ratios to rise.The FHA has acknowledged this issue and, similar to how HARP II waives reps and warrants on HARP refinances, the FHA will now exclude FHA Streamline Refinances from its Compare Ratio calculation.

12 August 2012 | 19 replies
Jake, can't follow the link, but without reading it, I can see the public purpose, however getting between a lender and a borrower may have some legal issues that they may not be able to afford to fight.

13 July 2012 | 11 replies
I think what they are seeing is competition in the business, more getting into the market who are seeing the possibilities compared to other opportunities. my 2 cents...