
9 November 2012 | 3 replies
Also, since the size of the deal is "small" we also would have very few investors.

7 January 2013 | 30 replies
When you guys buy a house to live in for a long period of time, do you buy as an investment hoping for appreciation or based simply on a budget and find something that meets your location, size, and architecture requirements?

18 March 2013 | 2 replies
I have wholesaled plenty houses and received nice sized checks at closing. but I would like to know if the process is the same.

10 March 2014 | 24 replies
What crowdfunding Jobs Act helps provide is a platform for smaller investors doing transactions under $500,000 in size who cannot not access the private equity groups or funds and do not have syndication capital raising contacts.

31 March 2017 | 129 replies
We had to keep the original foundation/footprint in order to be grandfathered.We built a duplex about twice the size of the original home.Each side is close to 1900SFKitchens sell homesBathrooms help sell, too.

1 October 2013 | 25 replies
Even with this background, my father insisted I obtain a formal educationI now have almost 50 years of personal experience that spans many segments of the real estate, finance, and business professions with many different sizes of projects, including a year-round ski resort.This much education is not a requirement to be successful.

29 September 2013 | 7 replies
I agree with @J ScottI actually had the costs for holding/selling a bit higher assuming use of hard money (Which for a project that size I would use) so my $330K buy price only had the profit about $6K higher assuming that $35K budget.How sure do you feel on that?

11 November 2013 | 6 replies
Recent sales in the neighborhood were 40-80K depending on condition, all similar size and layouts(large yard, detached garage, 1500-1700 sqft).

17 November 2013 | 54 replies
Risk assessment, at least an accurate assessment is mostly impossible for an individual and I'd doubt it's that accurate at a mid size institutional type either.While I understand some of your unique industry, inner-office phraseology such as "capital waterfall" it's not that well understood nor applicable to individual note investors here, while I understand it seems to embellish some sense of expertise in a post, it's poor communication to our audience and simply takes us to conceptual aspects rather than realistic and relevant analysis.