I have some (but not a ton) of experience renting and selling properties and would like to know if something is flawed in my logic.

So here's my plan:1.Create a list of possible buyers and learn what they want.This seems logical because if you know what people are looking for, you will know what kind of property to look for and save a lot of time, and also have people to contact if you do find a deal.I'm hoping to do this partially by this post.

Eviction is the remedy, logically and legally.

Basically, their logic is because I have signed the deal before closing the name of the deed only changes once.  

I really think word of mouth networking is best, but certainly might take more time and reach a more narrow audience.

However, I don't quite get that logic.

Based on this logic, I would need to start out with an actual before the deduction 100 higher to reach so that I would stay above my 300 minimum.

Here is my logic:5k upgrades amortized over 5 years (I use 5 years because everything gets dated and wears in about that much time) You are looking at a monthly amortized cost of about $84. 

Since I am submitting a lower offer and the seller has a broker working with him, then the broker will be more apt to accepting a low ball offer,  if he doesn't have to split the commission with another agent, just thinking about it logically. 

To get in front of your target audience and build momentum.