Use an FHA loan (up to 96.5% LTV) or other high LTV loan option to purchase a traditional home to owner occupy.  

It seems like a better way to retire off of buy and hold strategy vs traditional cash flow which might get you to retirement faster, but would require the management of many more units.

@Juancarlos Cortina I get my rental income TAX FREE because I use Roth IRA to own rental properties.

The decision to got with Roth or traditional retirement accounts simply comes down to tax rate arbitrage. 

This will increase your risk factor and unless it’s a fix and flip i would instead use more traditional means

If neither is more profitable than going the traditional route or if the profitability is not worth the "risk" you associate with this then don't do it, but at least do some research to determine what those risks truly are.And feel free to message me anytime if you have other questions or just want to chat!

A lot of forum members are very knowledgeable in their respective fields related to real estate investing, whether that is real estate sales, wholesaling, flipping, rentals, lending, self-directed IRA and Solo 401k investing, or tax and legal guidance.Discounts on some products and services are offered to BP members: https://www.biggerpockets.com/perks/proThe site has quite a few tools that can be helpful for new members.

No, you won't disqualify yourself in the future for a mortgage on your primary residence if you start buying rentals, especially if you go traditional over FHA.

An example would be a former work colleague who has recently retired with a sizable 401(k) and is looking to roll that money into an IRA and use some of it to fund real estate deals.So here's the tipoff: Most legitimate PLs are not out asking complete strangers if they need a loan! 

Someone asking for seller financing does not excite an agent.....that usually means they can’t qualify for financing and Very few sellers on the MLS are interested in financing the sale, especially if someone doesn’t qualify traditionally.