Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Landlording & Rental Properties
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 4 years ago,

User Stats

3
Posts
1
Votes
Matt Murphy
1
Votes |
3
Posts

The one house a year, 15 year retirement plan

Matt Murphy
Posted

I have heard about this strategy previously, but can’t find much about it now or know what it is called.

For the sake of this example, I am going to assume there is no appreciation.

Buy 1 house worth $300k per year and rent it out. Do this for 15 years and put them all on 15 year mortgages. At year 16, when the first house is paid off, you cash out refinance and live off of that for the year. In this example, assuming 75% LTV, you would pull out $225k and it would be tax free.

Has anyone ever done this or heard about it?  It seems like a better way to retire off of buy and hold strategy vs traditional cash flow which might get you to retirement faster, but would require the management of many more units.



Loading replies...