I would suggest the following:Remove identity theft coverage.

If they are VERY professional, they will have their processes in writing as verification that it is enforced equally and fairly by their entire staff.6.

I am in an almost identical family situation with a toddler and another on the way, living and working here in the Overbrook/Wynnewood area.

I purchased an identical second condo in the same complex for 65k and invested 20k for the rehab. 

So we had a listing on Zillow and a con-artist from out of the country.  They took all the photos of the listing as well as details about the property. Except they changed one major thing---the priceThe property is a ...

The agent was unable to get verification of the EMD and then failed to cancel the PA when he did not.

I would argue this is zeroing in on trusts because of the term "straw buying" and "identity theft" which eludes to historically fraudulent uses of them.

I'll stop, Dion might want to comment along these lines, might not, put just pointing out aspects considered that are part of the 1003 or in the verifications used in originations.Applicable to note buyers as you'd really like to see these aspects documented when the note was originated, that together with loan history really tells a story. :)Anyway, it could be a good spring board for questions that are never asked about notes.Like : Will a husband and wife always be required to be on a note/mortgage together?

Unless we're talking about an apartment complex owned by the same group where all the units are 100% identical (which isn't the case in terms of places I'm looking at). 

I’d say double check with your lender, but you will most likely be good with just the employment verification.