The only situation where I would consider buying a property at that price with $30k gross rental income would be if it was severely mismanaged and I saw the opportunity to grow the gross rental up to at least $45k (preferably more) or if there is a feature/amenity that could be easily added increasing rental desirability and the ADR so the gross rental reached my goal. 

As such, its my goal to help other investors plan ahead strategically, not just obtain financing for the deal at hand, but create a longterm strategy for financial growth through real estate investing.

Which market you are in matters: Job growth and population growth are two key factors for multifamily investors.

I can sympathize with you, my transition has been unsettling, a growth experience, and just plain strange.

Per our research the best markets to find deals under 100K are in cities with minimal population growth. 

Buy in good areas, favorable landlord laws, population growth.

Deciding whether to retain a property with significant equity but no positive cash flow in a market like Houston, known for long-term appreciation, involves considering factors such as the market's growth potential, the extent of cash flow deficit, tax benefits, equity leverage opportunities, your investment horizon, market conditions, and your overall financial objectives and risk tolerance.

In my opinion, if I can't get a 10% return on a rental property, I would rather put my money in a good growth stock with no hassles.

I think the city government is fully behind facilitating population growth.

Framingham jobs and population growth support the increasing rents.