data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/17bdf/17bdff3ac6e746c0e7927f80d0b3b3ab6c7c3938" alt=""
24 January 2014 | 20 replies
On paper it looks as though both of you brought equal shares to the deal – 50/50 partnership.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1007/f1007c1bb6ccec7b8c9a12cb50a23f96256714e1" alt=""
30 March 2013 | 34 replies
Just to pick'n on the lender's side giving equal time (LOL).And, in Mo., not sure if it's in effect yet, they were talking about requiring a 4 year degree (in anything) for an RE agent to get a license, that would improve the pool.
12 March 2013 | 10 replies
We will go as low as 10% of total hard costs down (with a premium on rate/fee for that amount down - less cash in equals higher risk loan) for an experienced rehabber, as long as the LTV of ARV does not exceed 65%.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb130/eb130bde2c43679b5ce6b77ad578840cc0008d10" alt=""
13 March 2013 | 6 replies
I am motivated beyond belief and know that I can over time turn $50k into a million.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59011/59011726979c10daee2d397ca6cfa76c4e11b385" alt=""
14 March 2013 | 9 replies
70% ARV generally means that they want the purchase plus renovations to be less than or equal to 70% of the resale value.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5533d/5533d6158db2918d87035b3d802d0f9fdfe3a80c" alt=""
16 March 2013 | 7 replies
I think you will be equally pleased. 2013 is so much better than 1999 ;)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5956a/5956aab724e5901ea658e4eb4c321f9ddb4dc639" alt=""
19 March 2013 | 36 replies
Members or partners do not need to fund activities or share profits equally.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/527be/527be329524a4fdf29a84733e067ff1928e35483" alt=""
19 March 2013 | 5 replies
One case I had in California was the will was drawn up by the surviving spouse and it gave the home to the daughter, however when the other spouse died they had a joint will which gave the house equally to all three kids and shouldn't have been changed because your changing the wishes of the first spouse to die.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3471/f3471b30ff8aeb8f224bb159e7ccbb16a746055b" alt=""
30 March 2013 | 47 replies
You should also charge the tenant/buyer an option fee which should equal $18,500 or 10% of purchase price.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2fcf0/2fcf04110506908ef8a7c46d5c60fa83a067202c" alt=""
23 March 2013 | 14 replies
It's just that everything else being equal, I'd rather live in a 4 than an 8.