
1 December 2009 | 4 replies
Stick to generic.With regard to landscape, you didn't mentioned your intention with the property.

2 June 2010 | 53 replies
IDF boarded that ship with nonlethal intent.

11 June 2010 | 114 replies
Ok, now to go into Vikram's first long and well intentioned but grossly misinformed post."

25 August 2011 | 42 replies
No but the only thing you can do is research as much as you can and be honest about the intentions of the property and move forward.

9 June 2010 | 4 replies
It may be your intention to stay in this house, but that's not a guarantee for the investor.

10 June 2010 | 8 replies
When I bought the home originally, my intent was to get married, start our family and within 4-5 years buy something larger for our growing family in an area with better schools.

8 January 2011 | 75 replies
The government really should not be involved in anything that can be done by the private sector.Agreed...In all seriousness, this is one of those areas where it's clear that the status quo isn't working (this country is now 15th in the world in education) and clearly the government has no intention of prioritizing education in any way, shape or form.Our educational system was designed around churning out good employees during the industrial revolution, and in retrospect (based on the success of this nation during that time) accomplished everything it set out to accomplish.

15 June 2010 | 14 replies
It is very hard to establish at tribunal that the damage was done intentionally with malice and not just out of stupidity: case example; tenant brought motorbike into living room to change oil and severly damaged/stained carpet - judge ruled tenant had not set out intentionally to cause damage to the carpet -so this was not covered on the other hand, different tenant caused offensive graffitti to internal walls -this was ruled to have been done intentionally with malice -so covered However, this policy comes into its own mainly for rent default, of varrying amounts depending on the circumstances but in some cases upto 12weeks if the tenant does a runner.

9 July 2010 | 9 replies
States will be in the driver's seat with their mandates and if states don't cover the intent of the Act, the feds (Hud) can move in and enforce the issues.