11 June 2014 | 14 replies
IMO: I would stay away from an ARM, you have to many risks involved that could permanently harm your future RE career.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ed7fa/ed7fa82f80d1ad0145d6c40d9c6f0fb479a6d732" alt=""
12 June 2014 | 3 replies
Since I have no reason to believe that he means me harm, I am wondering how he comes up with his calculations.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/591e9/591e9ea6552740dac7954fd5550df71c20e19838" alt=""
12 September 2014 | 4 replies
My suggestion which may differ from others is you should let the seller know up front what your intentions are so that in the event you dont sell it then no harm no foul.
15 September 2014 | 30 replies
This is not tie up a house with no ability to buy it and if it doesn't sell no harm, no foul.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe667/fe66785625214d922b8621c2d8dd53fd75a326c6" alt=""
1 October 2014 | 25 replies
Not making rounds to collect cash rent, not being in the house while prospective tenants are, pepper spray, maybe I'm just overly concerned about not putting myself in potential harms way.Your tagging doesn't seem to be working.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0d47/e0d4742f0edeb3fac835855cba4d410ca6b5baab" alt=""
20 January 2021 | 19 replies
I had a tenant with the same exact situation and she sent the papers, I let her break the lease with a 30-day notice.This is the least we can do for those who go on deployment and serve in harm's way!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09e84/09e84295d18ed3d80544c4e864797166fdec4a26" alt=""
23 February 2017 | 21 replies
. ;)To give some perspective, more than half of those BP podcast guests have never lived as an investor through a RE downturn, and I wish them no harm, but they are so leveraged up to grow fast that I'd bet that half of those more than half will end up going bankrupt in the next downturn.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65e4d/65e4d686c50514ab8740b31afb39cae7ce42f319" alt=""
21 February 2017 | 2 replies
They ended up having to 302 her, (involuntary commit her), so she wouldn't harm anyone else or herself.
1 March 2017 | 108 replies
This is especially true when you---the non-breaching party---did not suffer any harm.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/16d53/16d53bd4a8a0efaf3e09bca1d5f540154a7ad25c" alt=""
22 February 2017 | 7 replies
If I get a smarmy feeling about someone, I won't be so inclined at all, without exception.As for working with folks out of state, again - no harm in reaching out.