To the best of my knowledge, one of the tenants (married) are employed in the accounting field at a local air force base, which was the only reason I was considering it.

Most of landlords are not interested in doing Section 8 either, but we phrase it always the same that we will consider all applications as a whole and once we have the application we review it and see.In my opinion, no landlord should be forced to do Section 8 and I don't think it can happen, but you have to be very careful how you vet tenants and decide so you are open to all applicants, but still able to make an informed, best decision for yourself.

You  run the risk of running out of cash and being forced to sell. 

I have a 4 unit property that has forced air heat but no a/c.

The company who actually fixed the HVAC charged $268 but the "Preferred Vendor" middleman modified that invoice to include 6lbs of freon (not on the HVAC sub's invoice) and charged me $700.Latchel probably works fine if you force them to only use your vetted contractors, but I have zero respect for Latchel's "Preferred Vendors".

The change in regulations isn't about lowering commissions, it's about clearer disclosures regarding how commissions are paid and forcing agents to be better fiduciaries to their clients. 

@Michael MagnellFrom what I understand about WyCo, it can, but it looks like KCMO cash flows better...WyCo supports flip and forced equity deals relatively well, tho.

Nobody forced me to do it, I made the choice to invest in my life to EARN the life I wanted. 

Not sure what their rights are as a lender but the owner is fearful that now that she has REACHED the Maximum funding amount the Reverse Mortgage loan would go to - that she may be forced to sell?

I also avoid contractors who have dedicated sales people who drive logo wrap vehicles.I tend to support diversity where contractors who were born outside of the United States or were Veterans in the Armed Forces have worked out best for us.What are your best practices for choosing contractors?