Taking the limited route of using just one strategy means you would be missing out on at least 90% of your potential deals, and in the end you would start forcing your strategy onto properties that you have no business doing...then rationalizing that you did a good thing.One trick ponies lose more than they could ever gain.

If a renter sues you and you lose the case, the LLC would take the hit and not you personally. 

Her voucher is still frozen (at least it better be as she owes me money and The Housing Authority is aware of this).So to say Section 8 is guaranteed money and Section 8 tenants are afraid of losing their vouchers may be true in a lot of cases, but certainly not all.Though my biggest annoyance was with the Section 8 Housing Authority; they were inept.

Our tenant just moived out and made several unauthorized changes to our house, including installing a Ring doorbell (which was removed, leaving two large holes drilled into the brick) and installing an outlet and ethernet connection on the wall above the fireplace (which he sighted as an improvement, but I'm not sure most renters will install a 40+ in mounted tv, making it an eyesore on the mantle wall in my opinion).

Also, if it were easy--everyone would be doing it--It's NOT EASY--it takes a lot of specialized knowledge--or  "You're just throwing darts at a board and hoping to hit the bullseye".If Cardone handed you the keys to his Housing Empire--could you (A) keep it profitable; and (B) Expand it without losing everything.

Is it worth the risk of losing the low interest rate?

If they don't use it, they lose it.

Most sight unseen due to higher-level executives being given the opportunity to work from home. 

I would budget accordingly, but I wouldn't lose sleep over it either.

@Will ParksI agree with @Ronald Allen Barney You lose nothing by using a buyers agent on listed properties.