Sorry for rambling...Ive looked around for similar circumstances but haven’t found anything.Thanks so much even if general advice (not to be construed as tax advice).Thanks,Jason

Couldn't find anything on the forums here except for someone had mentioned a place about an hour away.

In order to get around that, you need to prove some change in circumstances such as in this case that you need to move closer to your job. 

That's awesome that you fought to change your circumstances!

I'm not saying every surveyor does their job perfectly & I'm not saying there isn't an extenuating circumstance with the handwriting, but I'd definitely look into it.

Generally putting rental real estate inside of any corporate tax entity (C or S) is not a good idea.If you're going to wholly own the RRE assets, owning directly or via a disregarded entity (SMLLC) is generally the way to go for income tax purposes.If you expect to have ~$100k of excess cash flow each year to invest, it might make a lot of sense to spend a little time with an attorney and tax CPA who can advise you based on your individual facts, circumstances, and goals. 

Here's a link to the specific zoning information, but the bottom line is the property is not zoned for residential use except on the second floor and above.

Except from the beachfront condo properties and one ocean front gated single family project, Loiza has a mostly a low income population. 

Who decides what an extenuating circumstance is? 

I would suggest talking with more lenders and explaining the situation to see if they would be able to lend based on your circumstance, not all lenders are created equally.