data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c5d42/c5d42010f32b5dfae9210b98da03730b0733ff58" alt=""
18 January 2011 | 16 replies
No real impact to that tenant who is now gone.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9854/e9854453a22675df810e6daaf02d1ead9b094cba" alt=""
26 January 2011 | 28 replies
Don't mix personal and business funds -- it makes accounting more difficult and impact the protection you get from having an entity.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b9084/b9084dc326654a4e5144f51981257a46c40aef93" alt=""
31 January 2011 | 1 reply
You will also want to learn about your significant others risk tolerance and financial goals if you have one.If you and/or your partner are very risk adverse then it is probably better that you just plan on all cash deals and start your investing as early as possible.If you can tolerate some risk then leverage is a good way to grow your RE assets more quickly.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd851/bd8512ba7ecb1b7dbc196847493277f5dbb8a45c" alt=""
1 February 2011 | 3 replies
It simply becomes cheaper for them to do the deal themselves and hire the help.I am only addressing your questions and not any of the other issues associated with commercial lending that could have an impact on whether the lender allows a seller second or not.
7 February 2011 | 6 replies
I think I understand your question...The refi should have no impact on your tax burden (ignoring write-offs for loan costs and mortgage interest).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/204c4/204c40f36d113dfc51db2ceba0dddfea2d0406cf" alt=""
8 February 2011 | 13 replies
The correct term is "adverse possession".
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da212/da212cdbc3671ae12fc520db294a05484661850c" alt=""
8 February 2011 | 8 replies
Most rehabbers have carrying costs which can be a significant impact.4.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/abdc8/abdc89c02db14b2ecb1429bbdf999208cc8e284c" alt=""
8 February 2011 | 7 replies
2 families definitely will impact a septic system and MAY well overload it.I would not allow it based on same.
11 February 2011 | 13 replies
The amount of bad loans on the books can limit smaller banks quicker than larger ones and require a quicker adjustment to operations where they may not make some loans for awhile, where a larger bank will have less of an impact on operations, especially in sold loan originations.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a196/5a196cc8b0f97b40bc95c7c315eec6b894669dc0" alt=""
11 February 2011 | 6 replies
I would say that I'm more risk adverse than most on here and cash flow is more important than ROI or any other factor so I bought my first house with cash.