Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Creative Real Estate Financing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 14 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

5
Posts
1
Votes
Brent P.
  • Banker
  • Chicago, IL
1
Votes |
5
Posts

No money down option for Apartment building?

Brent P.
  • Banker
  • Chicago, IL
Posted

I am just trying to figure out if a strategy like this COULD work.

It seems that the requirements for down payment on a commercial, multi-family is typically between 25-30%.

I do understand that seller carry back loans are no longer permitted, but what about a 25-30% ownership in the LLC that I use to purchase the building? My thought would be to obtain transactional funding for that amount, have the seller cover it after closing, and agree on repayment for his x% interest in the LLC.

Now I'm sure that this has red flags all over it, but is anything like this feasible?

Thanks

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

782
Posts
415
Votes
Darryl Dahlen
  • Commercial Loan Officer
  • Southern Maine, ME
415
Votes |
782
Posts
Darryl Dahlen
  • Commercial Loan Officer
  • Southern Maine, ME
Replied

Not likely, but the good news is there are still lenders who will allow seller seconds. From what I've seen, lenders have definitely scaled back on the amount the seller can hold. More than anything, this is to ensure you are injecting capital into the deal. In general, you need to contribute at least 10% of the purchase price, and if the seller is willing, they could feasibly hold a seller second for 10%. If the lender offers an LTV lower then 80% you would almost certainly have to come up with the difference. Of course there are always exceptions in lending so take this advice based on my experience and not an actual deal.

Perhaps there is a trend where lenders are not allowing seller seconds anymore, but for now, I know there are still some out there.

If you are looking to structure the deal so you don't have to put any "skin" in the game, then you're wasting your time if you are seeking conventional financing. Some will claim 100% financing is possible, but not using conventional methods.

However, IF you can line up a JV or an equity partner then you could feasibly close a deal with no money of your own, but that too is unlikely. For that to happen you would have to either find an absolute killer deal or bring a wealth of operational experience and/or be the actual contractor. From what I've seen, in those situations it is likely the JV/Equity entity will either cut you out of the transaction or wait until you fail and take the deal for themselves. It simply becomes cheaper for them to do the deal themselves and hire the help.

I am only addressing your questions and not any of the other issues associated with commercial lending that could have an impact on whether the lender allows a seller second or not.

Loading replies...