I’ve seen an LOX written to say some versions of the following; 1) This new property has a garage and I need a garage. 2) The new property has more/less sq. ft. and we need more/less space due to x (having a child, downsizing, etc.) 3) The new property is in a different, more desireable school zone (if applicable). 4) The new property is closer to where I work (or go to school, etc.)Although it isn’t always an ideal living situation for some people, I would highly encourage anyone in your situation that is investment-minded to use each of your VA loans back to back for each of you to buy a 4-unit building as the numbers tend to work best on those here in Clarksville and it would make sense, as long as the numbers work, of course, to get as many units as possible with zero out of pocket while you can.

Welcome to Bigger Pockets Bryan!

Early election results show that South Lake Tahoe may in fact ban vacation home rentals in three years.

Nice to see you are running the IRR and factoring in all three potential profit sources (cash flow, principle pay down, and appreciation).

This requires deep pockets.

I have two SFR properties in Texas (one in Spring for past three years and one in Conroe for past three months) which I plan on keeping for the long term while continuing to build my portfolio.

I have been researching on bigger pockets and the podcast without posting much.

I think the prospects of building smaller units 2-4 in prime locations are not feasible but I think there are pockets in the outer suburbs where land values are cheaper where it may work. 

I suspect one of three things:1.

Hi to everyone in the Biggger Pockets forums.