The basic logic being that construction costs per sq ft is much less than the cost per sq ft for purchasing existing properties in desirable areas. 

As in I make 50% more than airdna shows.Looking at it logically, airdna aggregates data from all owners including those that are doing a bad job. 

If you stick to your guns about how you're simply not renewing the lease, there is no disagreement, you're just not renewing.Theoretically, the same logic would apply to an annual lease, except you have to wait a whole lot longer to not renew the lease.

I am familiar with apartment units, but would this follow the same logic in regards to appreciation?

(which is highly logical, seeing as in federal loans are what drive tuition prices)

I think the logic behind all of it pretty fascinating and I find myself coming up with all sorts of hypotheticals I want to throw out into the world, and thought I'd start here. 

No point discussing when math and logic isn't applicable. 

So when I win, they think I'm crazy and when they win, I think the same of them.Is that logical, no, but if it's working for them when they win then they are doing it right.

Like I said, completely understand where you’re coming from, but logically those two aren’t comparible.

But you seem to be convinced that "hey Investor , you give me work , you give me money and how dare you ask to share the risk , give me 30k and just hope everything works out , if not resort to laws , But hey that logic doesn't apply to me , I won't take any risk , I am running a business but why should I take any risk , why should I resort to laws - My business should have zero risk , your business should have all the risk "I am sure the readers will understand the funny part .