At the same time, the abuses these statutes were designed to prevent are quite real, so a strong argument remains to keep them in place.

They have alot of templates that you can customize, and they are free but you pay for shipping.

We do not charge fees to the customer for our services, and having an attorney that you pay does not change a single thing that we can or will do for a customer.

I remember having knock-down, drag-out arguments with someone on another message board during the heyday of the market around 2005ish about ALL of the securities and derivatives markets being highly efficient.

I also use semi custom cabinets with quiet close drawers and Kohler toilets and rainshower heads, so I am not the norm.

I use a solo k to lend money, and work with multiple investors with their IRA's and 401k's, and I have grown increasingly frustrated at the terrible customer service at ETC.

Close the sale by getting the customer to take action.I've been blinded by the light a few times. @ the end of the day I've found that alot of the text book real estate investing "education" i get on books and CD's from the seminar's Ive attended doesn't apply in real life.

They can hold you responsible.†This site makes strong arguments.

There are two sides to the principle reduction argument.

Thought I'd try to revive this post once again as I'm interested in you guys' arguments for free and clear vs leveraged properties, especially insofar as the tax implications.