data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fedb2/fedb20a78b7408933856c8ae581aee4cb72e045c" alt=""
2 July 2015 | 16 replies
Given the complex structures, the additional costs for licensure and compliance, and the additional record keeping and reporting requirements, along with liability for examinations, they would need to charge the associated company far more than that company would be willing to pay.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/91cd4/91cd4586dd4d43576a1d0371fdcf3c87bd9a1c2b" alt=""
6 July 2015 | 12 replies
This looks like the place to be.Do any landlords here have insurance policies that cover personal liability with regard to tenant mold health issues.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/914c3/914c3f3c7b18755a4b049a7c79cb31a4c5808ec7" alt=""
10 July 2015 | 17 replies
A lot of Canadian investors opt for a limited liability limited partnership (LLLP) which might be a good option if you're going to be a partner.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f60e7/f60e7c6daa6d88760371d3b2f981c70e23a9f3fc" alt=""
8 July 2015 | 9 replies
This election will help you minimize self-employment tax liability.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05290/05290ddd15bc7ef2297adf678e4908888ef16a24" alt=""
14 July 2015 | 2 replies
I've heard that one shouldn't take out a LOC on a home that you are actually living in, that it's too much of a liability.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0abf4/0abf407a1b88b8c925852a1859bd6b7689e8c6d4" alt=""
13 April 2019 | 33 replies
And perhaps the best overall "exit strategy," aside from seller (underlying loan/s) or owner (owned outright) financing, in some instances... and much less potential 'liability,' with a faster turnaround time, so ultimately quite profitable, iF you properly 'vet,' preqaulify and then credit repair, etc. so 2/3rds to 3/4s plus can 'qualify,' and CLOSE in 12- 36 months, or so!?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/013ae/013aea8595c9256ccea3d59b91e74ed88ce76a1e" alt=""
7 July 2015 | 15 replies
This is why I consider subject-to a predatory acquisition strategy.Take away the only asset the seller has (House)While leaving the seller stuck with all the liability (Mortgage)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e06fb/e06fb638a0fc35dbe53047cb8b094ce5faaf480f" alt=""
18 October 2015 | 10 replies
Alternatively, instead of actually taking back the money you might consider pre-arranging a move of the mobile home to a new park (at least see if its economically feasible) and if it is something you would consider show up to the sellers how on the premise you're going to get your refund, and spring on her you'd be willing to settle the situation by receiving the refund (get it in your hand first) and instead of her having a liability to repay the $1,000 she's already spent you'll relieve her of the requirement to repay the $1,000 in exchange for you taking the trailer she'll not be able to sell to anyone else anyway.Its worth a shot if the economics work out.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6094/b60946e7ca603cb7ce470ec5fcdd37ed01a4d345" alt=""
7 July 2015 | 6 replies
I don't think too many small 401K's get review, but if the total plan liabilities began to equal or exceed assets on the annual Form 5500 reporting, that might be a red flag?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/16571/165719a89785044a3fb699eb1e05a77a73a86e82" alt=""
9 July 2015 | 4 replies
Or another option that our clients have pursued many times in the past has been for the LLC to complete a partial exchange and then after the fact dissolve the LLC and distribute the property to the members who want to go forward and the cash and associated tax liability to the individual wanting to cash out.