I am leaning toward rolling over 60-70%  (arbitrary number, no true rhyme or reason to it) and keeping the rest to be prepared for future properties.

@Marc Rice true, what I meant was more that locally if I can get a property stablized with $0 in, I'd more than likely be losing money every month.

If for some reason there was no number provided on the auditor's website we take the name and put it in true people search or fast people search and it skip traces them.

It’s nice to know that in practice this is true as well with the larger banks.

The cliches are true: perseverance, tell everyone what you're up to, attend reias, meet and greet, etc.Arjan 

But, business is business and you are entitled to keep some of the money for true losses.

I was caught off guard because I’ve never hear anything like that and wanted to come on here and see if it’s true?

Know that you will suck at this but practice builds technique Go get em 

Her voucher is still frozen (at least it better be as she owes me money and The Housing Authority is aware of this).So to say Section 8 is guaranteed money and Section 8 tenants are afraid of losing their vouchers may be true in a lot of cases, but certainly not all.Though my biggest annoyance was with the Section 8 Housing Authority; they were inept.

At 75% LTV, a 2% acq fee is equivalent to 8% of committed capital.Regarding the return of capital, is there a true-up clause or clawback upon sale?