When a property developer finds an old property in a historic district of an urban area that currently has many code violations not safe for human habitation, is there money or tax advantages out there they can get from the state and federal government to help them revitalize the property?

The biggest advice I can give is to secure a full-time job and save, build a habit of tracking your expenses and keep them low, build your credit (most useful if you will use a lender in the future), keep reading and learning about real estate investing, analyze deals (we're MBA's, we love analyzing!)

I understand the concept of not having your name on the llc, but what’s the harm really of losing some of the anonymity if you are still protected??

The reason being, without a working toilet, the unit wouldn't be considered habitable. 

I don't personally see the harm in getting 3 bids.

However, I am not too familiar with ozone generators and the harm they can cause.  

Can’t see the harm.....if it goes worst case and the tenant wants to/can buy the property, and you end up in court, the tenant would prevail anyway.

If the numbers work, then "no harm done".

Thanks Tenants, in most jurisdictions I'm aware of, have the ability to withhold rent when certain habitability conditions are not maintained.

Being the "land of steady habits", the political picture hasn't changed much over the years, most companies do not look to CT as a place to do business, and there aren't any recreational activities in most parts of the state.