It is a tangible object that is intrinsically valuable that you and only you can dictate what happens with it. 

May you please recommend a closing company whose object really is to reduce cost for the investor?

As far as I know he will not object to those items, if they are not working but he may check, if there is any safety issue!

Once you have an objective clearly defined, the next step with what to do with the MLS data will be apparent.

I have no objection to paying a reasonable wholesale fee but it's getting ridiculous.

Markets at the national median price will rarely cash flow, however, that doesn't mean higher priced markets aren't good investment markets if your objective is appreciation.

I'm sure your biggest objection is that you learned something different than what you set out to learn.

If the inspection revealed items that are not as you want them to be or not as advertised, you should be able to cancel your contract utilizing your inspection objection clause and receive your earnest money back.If you want to move forward, you can try to utilize the fact that one furnace is old, but the difference in price is not going to be all that different.

They cash flow very well with one property taking in $2,425 a month ($29,100 annually) and the other $2,245 a month ($26,940).I’m actually surprised at the hurdles I’m encountering trying to get someone to loan against these properties, even at a 50% LTV (conservative estimates are each building is worth $225k - $250k).Some of the more common objections I’ve heard are:“We don’t loan to out-of-state owners.”

I think one of the biggest problems I saw in folks' complaints, while working for an AMC, was undue influence via threats of complaints to the Appraisal board for no good reason or jamming objectively bad comparables down their throats and demanding they are used.